Comparison Overview

University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security

VS

De gelukkige ambtenaar

University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security

School of Law, Baltimore, MD, 21201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mdchhs.com/

The Center for Health and Homeland Security (CHHS) is a non-profit consulting firm and academic center that works with the nation’s top emergency responders in the public and private sector to develop plans, policies, and strategies for government, corporate, and institutional clients that ensure the safety of citizens in the event of natural or man-made catastrophes. We currently have over 50 professionals working on more than 90 contracts world-wide. We provide a unique perspective on emergency preparedness services. Built on an academic foundation, CHHS strives to develop new strategies and creative approaches to fulfill our clients'​ goals. As the experienced CHHS team discovers innovative ways to complete projects efficiently and effectively, we make consistent progress toward our own goal: excellence that exceeds expectations.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

De gelukkige ambtenaar

1325 jn, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849
http://www.degelukkigeambtenaar.nl

KANTELDENKEN is radicaal en biedt nieuwe mogelijkheden. Gelukkige burgers maken gelukkige ambtenaren is onze stellige overtuiging. Inspiratievernietigende regels, richtlijnen, formulieren en vergaderingen bederven het werkplezier. Waar swingt het (nog/al) binnen de overheid? Waar delen mensen nog collectieve ambitie? De projectorganisatie De Gelukkige Ambtenaar® ondersteunt de zoektocht naar de "nieuwe dialoog tussen burger en ambtenaar". En vindt daarmee de collectieve flow binnen de organisatie.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-maryland-center-for-health-and-homeland-security.jpeg
University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-gelukkige-ambtenaar.jpeg
De gelukkige ambtenaar
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
De gelukkige ambtenaar
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for De gelukkige ambtenaar in 2025.

Incident History — University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — De gelukkige ambtenaar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

De gelukkige ambtenaar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-maryland-center-for-health-and-homeland-security.jpeg
University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-gelukkige-ambtenaar.jpeg
De gelukkige ambtenaar
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

De gelukkige ambtenaar company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, De gelukkige ambtenaar company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security company.

In the current year, De gelukkige ambtenaar company and University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither De gelukkige ambtenaar company nor University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither De gelukkige ambtenaar company nor University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither De gelukkige ambtenaar company nor University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security company nor De gelukkige ambtenaar company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security nor De gelukkige ambtenaar holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security company nor De gelukkige ambtenaar company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security company employs more people globally than De gelukkige ambtenaar company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security nor De gelukkige ambtenaar holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security nor De gelukkige ambtenaar holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security nor De gelukkige ambtenaar holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security nor De gelukkige ambtenaar holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security nor De gelukkige ambtenaar holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security nor De gelukkige ambtenaar holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References