Comparison Overview

University of Louisville

VS

University of Missouri System

University of Louisville

2301 S 3rd St, Louisville, ky, US, 40292-0001
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://louisville.edu

The University of Louisville is a state supported research university located in Kentucky's largest metropolitan area. It was a municipally supported public institution for many decades prior to joining the university system in 1970. The University has three campuses. The 287-acre Belknap Campus is three miles from downtown Louisville and houses seven of the university's 11 colleges and schools. The Health Sciences Center is situated in downtown Louisville's medical complex and houses the university's health related programs and the University of Louisville Hospital. The 243-acre Shelby Campus is located in eastern Jefferson County.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 10,362
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

University of Missouri System

1100 Carrie Francke Drive, Columbia, 65211, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.umsystem.edu/

The University of Missouri System has provided teaching, research and service to Missouri and the nation since 1839. The university was the first publicly supported institution of higher education established in the Louisiana Purchase territory. Its philosophy of education was shaped in accordance with the ideals of Thomas Jefferson, who was an early proponent of higher education. Today, the University of Missouri System is one of the nation's largest and most prestigious public research universities, with more than 64,000 students on four campuses and hundreds of thousands served statewide through University of Missouri Extension and University of Missouri Health Care. The mission of the University of Missouri System, as a land-grant university and Missouri’s only public research and doctoral-level institution, is to discover, disseminate, preserve, and apply knowledge. The university promotes learning by its students and lifelong learning by Missouri’s citizens, fosters innovation to support economic development, and advances the health, cultural, and social interests of the people of Missouri, the nation, and the world.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 26,247
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-louisville.jpeg
University of Louisville
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-missouri-system.jpeg
University of Missouri System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Louisville
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Missouri System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Louisville in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Missouri System in 2026.

Incident History — University of Louisville (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Louisville cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Missouri System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Missouri System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-louisville.jpeg
University of Louisville
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2017
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-missouri-system.jpeg
University of Missouri System
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Louisville company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Missouri System company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Louisville and University of Missouri System have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, University of Missouri System company and University of Louisville company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Missouri System company nor University of Louisville company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Missouri System company nor University of Louisville company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Missouri System company nor University of Louisville company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

University of Missouri System company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while University of Louisville company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Louisville nor University of Missouri System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Louisville company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Missouri System company.

University of Missouri System company employs more people globally than University of Louisville company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Louisville nor University of Missouri System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor University of Missouri System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor University of Missouri System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor University of Missouri System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor University of Missouri System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor University of Missouri System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References