Comparison Overview

University of Louisville

VS

Texas Tech University

University of Louisville

2301 S 3rd St, Louisville, ky, US, 40292-0001
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://louisville.edu

The University of Louisville is a state supported research university located in Kentucky's largest metropolitan area. It was a municipally supported public institution for many decades prior to joining the university system in 1970. The University has three campuses. The 287-acre Belknap Campus is three miles from downtown Louisville and houses seven of the university's 11 colleges and schools. The Health Sciences Center is situated in downtown Louisville's medical complex and houses the university's health related programs and the University of Louisville Hospital. The 243-acre Shelby Campus is located in eastern Jefferson County.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 10,362
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Texas Tech University

2500 Broadway, Lubbock, Texas, 79409, tx, US, 79409-5005
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ttu.edu

A new era of excellence is dawning at Texas Tech University as it stands on the cusp of being one of the nation's premier research institutions. Research and enrollment numbers are at record levels, which cement Texas Tech's commitment to attracting and retaining quality students. In fall 2020, the university achieved a goal more than a decade in the making, reaching a total student population of more than 40,000. In 2018, the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education again placed Texas Tech among its top doctoral universities in the nation in the “Very High Research Activity” category. Texas Tech is one of 94 public institutions nationally and 131 overall to achieve this prestigious recognition. Quality students need top-notch faculty. Texas Tech is home to a diverse, highly revered pool of educators who excel in teaching, research and service. The university strives to foster an environment that celebrates student accomplishment above all else. Texas Tech is large enough to provide the best in facilities and academics but prides itself on being able to focus on each student individually. The momentum for excellence at Texas Tech has never been greater.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,327
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-louisville.jpeg
University of Louisville
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-tech-university.jpeg
Texas Tech University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Louisville
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Texas Tech University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Louisville in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Tech University in 2026.

Incident History — University of Louisville (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Louisville cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Texas Tech University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Tech University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-louisville.jpeg
University of Louisville
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2017
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-tech-university.jpeg
Texas Tech University
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Data Theft, Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Louisville company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Texas Tech University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Louisville and Texas Tech University have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Texas Tech University company and University of Louisville company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Texas Tech University company nor University of Louisville company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Texas Tech University company has disclosed at least one data breach, while University of Louisville company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Texas Tech University company nor University of Louisville company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Louisville company nor Texas Tech University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Louisville nor Texas Tech University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Louisville company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Texas Tech University company.

Texas Tech University company employs more people globally than University of Louisville company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Louisville nor Texas Tech University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Texas Tech University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Texas Tech University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Texas Tech University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Texas Tech University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Texas Tech University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References