Comparison Overview

University of Louisville

VS

Tecnológico de Monterrey

University of Louisville

2301 S 3rd St, Louisville, ky, US, 40292-0001
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://louisville.edu

The University of Louisville is a state supported research university located in Kentucky's largest metropolitan area. It was a municipally supported public institution for many decades prior to joining the university system in 1970. The University has three campuses. The 287-acre Belknap Campus is three miles from downtown Louisville and houses seven of the university's 11 colleges and schools. The Health Sciences Center is situated in downtown Louisville's medical complex and houses the university's health related programs and the University of Louisville Hospital. The 243-acre Shelby Campus is located in eastern Jefferson County.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 10,362
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Tecnológico de Monterrey

Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Colonia Tecnológico, Monterrey, nuevo león, MX, 64849
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849
https://tec.mx

The Tecnológico de Monterrey is a private university system with 33 campuses in 26 cities in Mexico, which serves more than 96,000 students in its high school, undergraduate and graduate programs. It also has liaison offices in 12 countries. Through the promotion of research, generation of knowledge transfer models and technology, it promotes the building of a knowledge-based economy to support the economic, political and social development of the country's regions.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 28,132
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-louisville.jpeg
University of Louisville
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tecdemonterrey.jpeg
Tecnológico de Monterrey
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Louisville
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tecnológico de Monterrey
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Louisville in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tecnológico de Monterrey in 2026.

Incident History — University of Louisville (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Louisville cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tecnológico de Monterrey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tecnológico de Monterrey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-louisville.jpeg
University of Louisville
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2017
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tecdemonterrey.jpeg
Tecnológico de Monterrey
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tecnológico de Monterrey company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Louisville company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Louisville company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Tecnológico de Monterrey company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tecnológico de Monterrey company and University of Louisville company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tecnológico de Monterrey company nor University of Louisville company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tecnológico de Monterrey company nor University of Louisville company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tecnológico de Monterrey company nor University of Louisville company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Louisville company nor Tecnológico de Monterrey company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Louisville nor Tecnológico de Monterrey holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tecnológico de Monterrey company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Louisville company.

Tecnológico de Monterrey company employs more people globally than University of Louisville company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Louisville nor Tecnológico de Monterrey holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Tecnológico de Monterrey holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Tecnológico de Monterrey holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Tecnológico de Monterrey holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Tecnológico de Monterrey holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Louisville nor Tecnológico de Monterrey holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References