Comparison Overview

University of Houston

VS

University of Missouri System

University of Houston

4300 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX, US, 77204
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://uh.edu

Founded in 1927, the University of Houston is the leading public research university in the vibrant international city of Houston. Each year, we educate more than 47,000 students in more than 250 undergraduate and graduate academic programs, on campus and online. UH awards over 10,000 degrees annually, with more than 332,000 alumni.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,323
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

University of Missouri System

1100 Carrie Francke Drive, None, Columbia, Missouri, US, 65211
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.umsystem.edu/

The University of Missouri System has provided teaching, research and service to Missouri and the nation since 1839. The university was the first publicly supported institution of higher education established in the Louisiana Purchase territory. Its philosophy of education was shaped in accordance with the ideals of Thomas Jefferson, who was an early proponent of higher education. Today, the University of Missouri System is one of the nation's largest and most prestigious public research universities, with more than 64,000 students on four campuses and hundreds of thousands served statewide through University of Missouri Extension and University of Missouri Health Care. The mission of the University of Missouri System, as a land-grant university and Missouri’s only public research and doctoral-level institution, is to discover, disseminate, preserve, and apply knowledge. The university promotes learning by its students and lifelong learning by Missouri’s citizens, fosters innovation to support economic development, and advances the health, cultural, and social interests of the people of Missouri, the nation, and the world.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 25,426
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-houston.jpeg
University of Houston
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-missouri-system.jpeg
University of Missouri System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Houston
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Missouri System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Houston in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Missouri System in 2026.

Incident History — University of Houston (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Houston cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Missouri System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Missouri System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-houston.jpeg
University of Houston
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-missouri-system.jpeg
University of Missouri System
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Houston company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Missouri System company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Missouri System company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Houston company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Missouri System company and University of Houston company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Missouri System company nor University of Houston company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Missouri System company nor University of Houston company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Missouri System company nor University of Houston company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

University of Missouri System company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while University of Houston company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Houston nor University of Missouri System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Houston company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Missouri System company.

University of Missouri System company employs more people globally than University of Houston company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Houston nor University of Missouri System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Houston nor University of Missouri System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Houston nor University of Missouri System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Houston nor University of Missouri System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Houston nor University of Missouri System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Houston nor University of Missouri System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References