Comparison Overview

University of Cincinnati

VS

UC Irvine

University of Cincinnati

2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio, US, 45221-0063
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://http://www.uc.edu

The University of Cincinnati, top 5 university for co-op and internships, offers students a balance of academic excellence and real-world experience. Since its founding in 1819, UC has been the source of many discoveries creating positive change for society, including the first antihistamine, the first cooperative education program, the first electronic organ, and the oral polio vaccine. Each year, this urban, public, research university graduates nearly 10,000 students, adding to more than 300,000 living alumni around the world. UC is the largest employer in the Cincinnati region, with an economic impact of more than $4.2 billion.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 16,680
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

UC Irvine

501 Aldrich Hall, Irvine, CA, US, 92697
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
http://uci.edu

Since 1965, the University of California, Irvine has combined the strengths of a major research university with the bounty of an incomparable Southern California location. As a U.S. News & World Report top 10 public university, UCI’s unyielding commitment to rigorous academics, cutting-edge research, and leadership and character development makes the campus a driving force for innovation and discovery that serves our local, national and global communities in many ways. With more than 37,000 students, 1,497 faculty members and 11,622 staff, UCI is among the most dynamic campuses in the University of California system. Increasingly a first-choice campus for students, UCI ranks among the top U.S. universities in the number of undergraduate applications and continues to admit freshmen with highly competitive academic profiles. UCI is also ranked No. 2 by U.S. News & World Report for social mobility, which takes into account the graduation rate of students awarded Pell Grants. Orange County’s second-largest employer, UCI generates an annual economic impact on the county of $7 billion. http://www.uci.edu/

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 14,113
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-cincinnati.jpeg
University of Cincinnati
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-california-irvine.jpeg
UC Irvine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Cincinnati
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UC Irvine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Cincinnati in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UC Irvine in 2026.

Incident History — University of Cincinnati (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Cincinnati cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UC Irvine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UC Irvine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-cincinnati.jpeg
University of Cincinnati
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-california-irvine.jpeg
UC Irvine
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both University of Cincinnati company and UC Irvine company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

UC Irvine company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Cincinnati company has not reported any.

In the current year, UC Irvine company and University of Cincinnati company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UC Irvine company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Cincinnati company has not reported such incidents publicly.

UC Irvine company has disclosed at least one data breach, while University of Cincinnati company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UC Irvine company nor University of Cincinnati company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Cincinnati company nor UC Irvine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor UC Irvine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UC Irvine company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Cincinnati company.

University of Cincinnati company employs more people globally than UC Irvine company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor UC Irvine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor UC Irvine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor UC Irvine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor UC Irvine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor UC Irvine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor UC Irvine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References