Comparison Overview

University of Cincinnati

VS

University of California, San Francisco

University of Cincinnati

2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio, US, 45221-0063
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 800 and 849

The University of Cincinnati, top 5 university for co-op and internships, offers students a balance of academic excellence and real-world experience. Since its founding in 1819, UC has been the source of many discoveries creating positive change for society, including the first antihistamine, the first cooperative education program, the first electronic organ, and the oral polio vaccine. Each year, this urban, public, research university graduates nearly 10,000 students, adding to more than 300,000 living alumni around the world. UC is the largest employer in the Cincinnati region, with an economic impact of more than $4.2 billion.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 16,680
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of California, San Francisco

530 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, California, US, 94122
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 650 and 699

UC San Francisco is driven by the idea that when the best research, the best education and the best patient care converge, great breakthroughs are achieved. We pursue this integrated excellence with singular focus, fueled by collaboration among our top-ranked professional and graduate schools, medical center, research programs and support teams.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 21,340
Subsidiaries: 57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-cincinnati.jpeg
University of Cincinnati
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucsf.jpeg
University of California, San Francisco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Cincinnati
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of California, San Francisco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Cincinnati in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of California, San Francisco in 2026.

Incident History — University of Cincinnati (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Cincinnati cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of California, San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of California, San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-cincinnati.jpeg
University of Cincinnati
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucsf.jpeg
University of California, San Francisco
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Cincinnati company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of California, San Francisco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of California, San Francisco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Cincinnati company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of California, San Francisco company and University of Cincinnati company have not reported any cyber incidents.

University of California, San Francisco company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Cincinnati company has not reported such incidents publicly.

University of California, San Francisco company has disclosed at least one data breach, while University of Cincinnati company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of California, San Francisco company nor University of Cincinnati company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Cincinnati company nor University of California, San Francisco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor University of California, San Francisco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of California, San Francisco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Cincinnati company.

University of California, San Francisco company employs more people globally than University of Cincinnati company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor University of California, San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor University of California, San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor University of California, San Francisco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor University of California, San Francisco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor University of California, San Francisco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Cincinnati nor University of California, San Francisco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H