Comparison Overview

University of Chicago Press

VS

The Guardian

University of Chicago Press

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Since its origins in 1890 as one of the three main divisions of the University of Chicago, the Press has embraced as its mission the obligation to disseminate scholarship of the highest standard and to publish serious works that foster public understanding, provide an authoritative foundation for informed dialogue, and enrich the diversity of cultural life. Our publications actively engage with timely issues and debates and are written by authors who are the foremost experts in their fields. Through our books and journals, we seek not only to advance scholarly conversation within and across traditional disciplines but, in keeping with the University of Chicago’s experimental tradition, to help define new areas of knowledge and intellectual endeavor.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 248
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Guardian

Kings Place, London, undefined, N1 9GU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Guardian News & Media (GNM) publishes theguardian.com, one of the world’s leading English-language newspaper websites. It also has a presence in the US and Australia as Guardian US and Guardian Australia. Traffic from outside of the UK now represents around two-thirds of the Guardian’s total digital audience. In the UK, GNM publishes the Guardian newspaper six days a week, first published in 1821, and the world’s oldest Sunday newspaper, The Observer. The Guardian is renowned for its agenda-setting journalism including, most recently the Cambridge Analytica, Paradise and Panama Papers investigations as well as the Pulitzer Prize and Emmy-winning NSA revelations.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2,582
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-chicago-press.jpeg
University of Chicago Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guardian-news-&-media.jpeg
The Guardian
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Chicago Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Guardian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Chicago Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Guardian in 2025.

Incident History — University of Chicago Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Chicago Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Guardian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Guardian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-chicago-press.jpeg
University of Chicago Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guardian-news-&-media.jpeg
The Guardian
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Guardian company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Chicago Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Guardian company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Chicago Press company.

In the current year, The Guardian company and University of Chicago Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Guardian company nor University of Chicago Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Guardian company nor University of Chicago Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Guardian company nor University of Chicago Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Chicago Press company nor The Guardian company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Chicago Press nor The Guardian holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither University of Chicago Press company nor The Guardian company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Guardian company employs more people globally than University of Chicago Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither University of Chicago Press nor The Guardian holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Chicago Press nor The Guardian holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Chicago Press nor The Guardian holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Chicago Press nor The Guardian holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Chicago Press nor The Guardian holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Chicago Press nor The Guardian holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.