Comparison Overview

UC Irvine

VS

University of Oklahoma

UC Irvine

501 Aldrich Hall, Irvine, CA, US, 92697
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://uci.edu

Since 1965, the University of California, Irvine has combined the strengths of a major research university with the bounty of an incomparable Southern California location. As a U.S. News & World Report top 10 public university, UCI’s unyielding commitment to rigorous academics, cutting-edge research, and leadership and character development makes the campus a driving force for innovation and discovery that serves our local, national and global communities in many ways. With more than 37,000 students, 1,497 faculty members and 11,622 staff, UCI is among the most dynamic campuses in the University of California system. Increasingly a first-choice campus for students, UCI ranks among the top U.S. universities in the number of undergraduate applications and continues to admit freshmen with highly competitive academic profiles. UCI is also ranked No. 2 by U.S. News & World Report for social mobility, which takes into account the graduation rate of students awarded Pell Grants. Orange County’s second-largest employer, UCI generates an annual economic impact on the county of $7 billion. http://www.uci.edu/

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 14,113
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
3
View Profile

University of Oklahoma

660 N Parrington Oval, Norman, Oklahoma, US, 73019
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799
http://ou.edu

Attracting top students from across the nation and more than 100 countries around the world, OU provides a major university experience in a private college atmosphere. In fact, OU is number one in the nation in the number of National Merit Scholars enrolled at a public university, and is in the top five of public universities in the nation in the graduation of Rhodes Scholars. OU has emerged as a pacesetter for public higher education in the United States and is ranked by The Princeton Review among the top 10 public universities in the nation in terms of academic excellence and cost for students. Specialties Architecture, Arts & Sciences, Atmospheric & Geographic Sciences, Business, Engineering, Fine Arts, International Studies, Journalism, Law

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,504
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-california-irvine.jpeg
UC Irvine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-oklahoma.jpeg
University of Oklahoma
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UC Irvine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Oklahoma
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UC Irvine in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Oklahoma in 2026.

Incident History — UC Irvine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UC Irvine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Oklahoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Oklahoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-california-irvine.jpeg
UC Irvine
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-oklahoma.jpeg
University of Oklahoma
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2002
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Lax privacy settings in a campus file-sharing network
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UC Irvine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Oklahoma company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UC Irvine company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to University of Oklahoma company.

In the current year, University of Oklahoma company and UC Irvine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UC Irvine company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Oklahoma company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both University of Oklahoma company and UC Irvine company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither University of Oklahoma company nor UC Irvine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UC Irvine company nor University of Oklahoma company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UC Irvine nor University of Oklahoma holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UC Irvine company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Oklahoma company.

UC Irvine company employs more people globally than University of Oklahoma company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither UC Irvine nor University of Oklahoma holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UC Irvine nor University of Oklahoma holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UC Irvine nor University of Oklahoma holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UC Irvine nor University of Oklahoma holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UC Irvine nor University of Oklahoma holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UC Irvine nor University of Oklahoma holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References