Comparison Overview

University of Birmingham

VS

Florida International University

University of Birmingham

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/

Welcome to the official LinkedIn page for the University of Birmingham . We have been challenging and developing great minds for more than a century. Characterised by a tradition of innovation, research at the University has broken new ground, pushed forward the boundaries of knowledge and made an impact on people’s lives. View our comment moderation policy here: https://linktr.ee/unibirmingham

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 13,839
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Florida International University

11200 S. W. 8 Street, Miami, FL, US, 33199
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fiu.edu

FIU is Miami's public research university. Offering bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees, both on campus and fully online. Designated a Preeminent State Research University, FIU emphasizes research as a major component in the university's mission. For more than 50 years, FIU has positioned itself as one of South Florida's anchor institutions by solving some of the greatest challenges of our time. We are dedicated to enriching the lives of the local and global community. With a student body of more than 56,000, we are among the largest universities in the nation and have collectively graduated more than 300,000 alumni, 165,000 of whom live and work in South Florida.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,457
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-birmingham.jpeg
University of Birmingham
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-international-university.jpeg
Florida International University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Birmingham
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Florida International University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Birmingham in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida International University in 2025.

Incident History — University of Birmingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Birmingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Florida International University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida International University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-birmingham.jpeg
University of Birmingham
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-international-university.jpeg
Florida International University
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Birmingham company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Florida International University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Birmingham and Florida International University have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Florida International University company and University of Birmingham company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Florida International University company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Birmingham company has not reported such incidents publicly.

University of Birmingham company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Florida International University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Florida International University company nor University of Birmingham company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Birmingham company nor Florida International University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Birmingham nor Florida International University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Florida International University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Birmingham company.

University of Birmingham company employs more people globally than Florida International University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Birmingham nor Florida International University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Birmingham nor Florida International University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Birmingham nor Florida International University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Birmingham nor Florida International University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Birmingham nor Florida International University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Birmingham nor Florida International University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References