Comparison Overview

University of Auckland

VS

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

University of Auckland

Private Bag 92019, Auckland, NZ, 1142
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Waipapa Taumata Rau | University of Auckland is New Zealand’s largest and leading university. We celebrate our location in the beautiful harbour city of Auckland | Tamaki Makaurau, our unique position in Aotearoa New Zealand and our place within the Pacific. Our te reo Māori name was gifted by Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei, the Indigenous peoples of the Auckland area, and symbolises that this is a place where diverse world views are shared and lifelong journeys of inquiry, learning and service begin. Since its founding in 1883, the University of Auckland has grown to become New Zealand's flagship, research-led university, known for the excellence of its teaching, its research, and its service to local, national and international communities.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,357
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign is dedicated to building upon its tradition of excellence in education, research, public engagement and economic development. More than 3,000 faculty members discover and create new knowledge. Their work is an economic engine for the state and is recognized with many of the world’s top academic and creative awards. The campus’ outstanding academic programs, extraordinary resources and bountiful opportunities attract top-caliber students. They join research teams, spend semesters abroad, create art in old and new ways and lead and participate in hundreds of student organizations. The Urbana campus has more than 425,000 alumni who are global leaders across the spectrum of human endeavor.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 21,797
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-auckland.jpeg
University of Auckland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-illinois-urbana-champaign.jpeg
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Auckland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Auckland in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 2025.

Incident History — University of Auckland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Auckland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-auckland.jpeg
University of Auckland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-illinois-urbana-champaign.jpeg
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Auckland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Auckland company.

In the current year, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company and University of Auckland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company nor University of Auckland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company nor University of Auckland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company nor University of Auckland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Auckland company nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Auckland company.

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company employs more people globally than University of Auckland company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H