Comparison Overview

University of Auckland

VS

University of Alberta

University of Auckland

Private Bag 92019, Auckland, NZ, 1142
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799

Waipapa Taumata Rau | University of Auckland is New Zealand’s largest and leading university. We celebrate our location in the beautiful harbour city of Auckland | Tamaki Makaurau, our unique position in Aotearoa New Zealand and our place within the Pacific. Our te reo Māori name was gifted by Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei, the Indigenous peoples of the Auckland area, and symbolises that this is a place where diverse world views are shared and lifelong journeys of inquiry, learning and service begin. Since its founding in 1883, the University of Auckland has grown to become New Zealand's flagship, research-led university, known for the excellence of its teaching, its research, and its service to local, national and international communities.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,263
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Alberta

Edmonton, T6G 2R3, Edmonton, ab, T6G 2R3, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

The University of Alberta is one of Canada’s top teaching and research universities, with an international reputation for excellence across the humanities, sciences, creative arts, business, engineering, and health sciences. Home to more than 39,000 students and 15,000 faculty and staff, the university has an annual budget of $1.7 billion and attracts nearly $450 million in sponsored research revenue. The U of A offers close to 400 rigorous undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs in 18 faculties on five campuses. The university has more than 250,000 alumni worldwide. The university and its people remain dedicated to the promise made in 1908 by founding president Henry Marshall Tory that knowledge shall be used for “uplifting the whole people."​

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 15,583
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-auckland.jpeg
University of Auckland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-alberta.jpeg
University of Alberta
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Auckland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Alberta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Auckland in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Alberta in 2026.

Incident History — University of Auckland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Auckland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Alberta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Alberta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-auckland.jpeg
University of Auckland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-alberta.jpeg
University of Alberta
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Alberta company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Auckland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, University of Alberta company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Auckland company.

In the current year, University of Alberta company and University of Auckland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Alberta company nor University of Auckland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Alberta company nor University of Auckland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Alberta company nor University of Auckland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Auckland company nor University of Alberta company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Alberta holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Auckland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Alberta company.

University of Alberta company employs more people globally than University of Auckland company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Alberta holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Alberta holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Alberta holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Alberta holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Alberta holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor University of Alberta holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.