Comparison Overview

University of Auckland

VS

Lund University

University of Auckland

Private Bag 92019, Auckland, NZ, 1142
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.auckland.ac.nz/

Waipapa Taumata Rau | University of Auckland is New Zealand’s largest and leading university. We celebrate our location in the beautiful harbour city of Auckland | Tamaki Makaurau, our unique position in Aotearoa New Zealand and our place within the Pacific. Our te reo Māori name was gifted by Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei, the Indigenous peoples of the Auckland area, and symbolises that this is a place where diverse world views are shared and lifelong journeys of inquiry, learning and service begin. Since its founding in 1883, the University of Auckland has grown to become New Zealand's flagship, research-led university, known for the excellence of its teaching, its research, and its service to local, national and international communities.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,263
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lund University

Lund University, Box 117, Lund, SE, 221 00
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lunduniversity.lu.se

Lund University has around 46 000 students and 8 600 staff based in Lund, Helsingborg and Malmö. We are united in our efforts to understand, explain and improve our world and the human condition. Lund is considered one of the most popular study locations in Sweden. The University offers one of the broadest ranges of programmes and courses in Scandinavia, based on cross-disciplinary and cutting-edge research. The unique disciplinary range encourages boundary-crossing collaborations both within academia and with wider society, creating great conditions for scientific breakthroughs and innovations. The University has a distinct international profile, with partner universities in 76 countries. Lund University has an annual turnover of EUR 954 million, of which two-thirds go to research in our nine faculties, enabling us to offer one of the strongest and broadest ranges of research in Scandinavia. About this page: Lund University’s official LinkedIn page is managed by the communications department at Lund University. You are welcome to comment on our posts, but please do not post anything containing inappropriate language, personal attacks, sexual harassment, spam or advertising, confidential personal data, or copyright material. Contributions are monitored and material that violates Swedish law or is off topic will be removed.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 10,054
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-auckland.jpeg
University of Auckland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lunduniversity.jpeg
Lund University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Auckland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lund University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Auckland in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lund University in 2026.

Incident History — University of Auckland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Auckland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lund University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lund University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-auckland.jpeg
University of Auckland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lunduniversity.jpeg
Lund University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Auckland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lund University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lund University company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Auckland company.

In the current year, Lund University company and University of Auckland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lund University company nor University of Auckland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lund University company nor University of Auckland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lund University company nor University of Auckland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Auckland company nor Lund University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Auckland nor Lund University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lund University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Auckland company.

University of Auckland company employs more people globally than Lund University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Auckland nor Lund University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor Lund University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor Lund University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor Lund University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor Lund University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Auckland nor Lund University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References