Comparison Overview

University of Amsterdam

VS

UCL

University of Amsterdam

Spui 21, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, 1012 WX
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.uva.nl

The University of Amsterdam is one of the largest comprehensive universities in Europe. With some 44,000 students, 6,000 staff, 3,000 PhD candidates, and an annual budget of more than 850 million euros, it is also one of Amsterdam’s biggest employers. There is an inseparable link between the university and its host city. The freedom and creativity with which Amsterdam has long been associated have worked their way into the fabric of the university. This is a place where individuality, authenticity and diversity are celebrated as sources of stimulation, inspiration and innovation. Professional and personal development, challenges and collaboration are undertaken in a versatile and multidimensional (inter)national ecosystem with leading stakeholders. Staff at the UvA make a meaningful contribution to uncovering solutions to some of the world’s most significant problems and to developing the next generation of talent.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 11,136
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

UCL

Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, London, Greater London, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/

UCL (University College London) is London's leading multidisciplinary university, ranked 9th in the QS World University Rankings. Established in 1826 UCL opened up education in England for the first time to students of any race, class or religion and was also the first university to welcome female students on equal terms with men. Today UCL is made up of remarkable people: eminent professors and exceptional students. Academic excellence and conducting research that addresses real-world problems inform our ethos to this day. To see more photos of UCL you can visit our Flickr Gallery: www.flickr.com/photos/uclnews/sets/ To view videos of UCL and our work, you can subscribe to our YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/UCLTV Looking for a job at UCL? Find out more about working with us and view the latest vacancies: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/jobs

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 24,088
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-amsterdam.jpeg
University of Amsterdam
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-college-london.jpeg
UCL
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Amsterdam
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UCL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Amsterdam in 2026.

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCL in 2026.

Incident History — University of Amsterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Amsterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UCL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-amsterdam.jpeg
University of Amsterdam
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-college-london.jpeg
UCL
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2017
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UCL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Amsterdam company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UCL company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Amsterdam company has not reported any.

In the current year, UCL company and University of Amsterdam company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UCL company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Amsterdam company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UCL company nor University of Amsterdam company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither UCL company nor University of Amsterdam company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Amsterdam company nor UCL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor UCL holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Amsterdam company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UCL company.

UCL company employs more people globally than University of Amsterdam company, reflecting its scale as a Research Services.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor UCL holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor UCL holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor UCL holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor UCL holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor UCL holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Amsterdam nor UCL holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References