Comparison Overview

UCL

VS

Los Alamos National Laboratory

UCL

Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, London, Greater London, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/

UCL (University College London) is London's leading multidisciplinary university, ranked 9th in the QS World University Rankings. Established in 1826 UCL opened up education in England for the first time to students of any race, class or religion and was also the first university to welcome female students on equal terms with men. Today UCL is made up of remarkable people: eminent professors and exceptional students. Academic excellence and conducting research that addresses real-world problems inform our ethos to this day. To see more photos of UCL you can visit our Flickr Gallery: www.flickr.com/photos/uclnews/sets/ To view videos of UCL and our work, you can subscribe to our YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/UCLTV Looking for a job at UCL? Find out more about working with us and view the latest vacancies: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/jobs

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 23,173
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Los Alamos National Laboratory

P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lanl.gov/

Los Alamos National Laboratory is one of the world’s most innovative multidisciplinary research institutions. We're engaged in strategic science on behalf of national security to ensure the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. Our workforce specializes in a wide range of progressive science, technology and engineering across many exciting fields, including space exploration, geophysics, renewable energy, supercomputing, medicine and nanotechnology.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 12,714
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-college-london.jpeg
UCL
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/los-alamos-national-laboratory.jpeg
Los Alamos National Laboratory
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UCL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Los Alamos National Laboratory
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCL in 2025.

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Los Alamos National Laboratory in 2025.

Incident History — UCL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Los Alamos National Laboratory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Los Alamos National Laboratory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-college-london.jpeg
UCL
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2017
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/los-alamos-national-laboratory.jpeg
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UCL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Los Alamos National Laboratory company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UCL company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Los Alamos National Laboratory company has not reported any.

In the current year, Los Alamos National Laboratory company and UCL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UCL company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Los Alamos National Laboratory company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Los Alamos National Laboratory company nor UCL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Los Alamos National Laboratory company nor UCL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UCL company nor Los Alamos National Laboratory company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UCL nor Los Alamos National Laboratory holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UCL company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Los Alamos National Laboratory company.

UCL company employs more people globally than Los Alamos National Laboratory company, reflecting its scale as a Research Services.

Neither UCL nor Los Alamos National Laboratory holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UCL nor Los Alamos National Laboratory holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UCL nor Los Alamos National Laboratory holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UCL nor Los Alamos National Laboratory holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UCL nor Los Alamos National Laboratory holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UCL nor Los Alamos National Laboratory holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References