Comparison Overview

University at Buffalo Advancement

VS

The Funding Centre

University at Buffalo Advancement

503 Capen Hall, Buffalo, 14260, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Impactful research, scholarly distinction, transformative student experiences, and far-reaching service to local, state, national, and international communities define UB’s mission as one of the nation’s leading public research universities. The Division of University Advancement leads the fundraising and engagement activities with alumni and friends around the world. Through partnerships with generous and grateful donors, philanthropy plays an enormous role in advancing the university’s ambition to become one of the Top 25 public research universities in the country. Interested in supporting a leading public research university and its students? Do you want to work at a university where you can make your mark? Contact us today at [email protected].

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Funding Centre

Cardiff, gb
Last Update: 2025-12-18

The Funding Centre is a specialist fundraising consultancy based in Cardiff in the UK. We provide training and advice to charities and other not-for-profits in order to make them more successful and sustainable. Our consultants are all highly experienced and successful fundraising practitioners drawn from the sector and most have direct experience of the arts, heritage, social causes and international development, sectors. Our main focus since launching has been on providing consultancy and advice as well as campaign management. We do this by providing strategic advice to senior staff and Board members, training and mentoring of staff responsible for fundraising or practical hands-on fundraising.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-at-buffalo-university-advancement.jpeg
University at Buffalo Advancement
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-funding-centre.jpeg
The Funding Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University at Buffalo Advancement
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Funding Centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University at Buffalo Advancement in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Funding Centre in 2025.

Incident History — University at Buffalo Advancement (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University at Buffalo Advancement cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Funding Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Funding Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-at-buffalo-university-advancement.jpeg
University at Buffalo Advancement
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-funding-centre.jpeg
The Funding Centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both University at Buffalo Advancement company and The Funding Centre company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Funding Centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University at Buffalo Advancement company.

In the current year, The Funding Centre company and University at Buffalo Advancement company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Funding Centre company nor University at Buffalo Advancement company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Funding Centre company nor University at Buffalo Advancement company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Funding Centre company nor University at Buffalo Advancement company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University at Buffalo Advancement company nor The Funding Centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University at Buffalo Advancement nor The Funding Centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither University at Buffalo Advancement company nor The Funding Centre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

University at Buffalo Advancement company employs more people globally than The Funding Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither University at Buffalo Advancement nor The Funding Centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University at Buffalo Advancement nor The Funding Centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University at Buffalo Advancement nor The Funding Centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University at Buffalo Advancement nor The Funding Centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University at Buffalo Advancement nor The Funding Centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University at Buffalo Advancement nor The Funding Centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N