Comparison Overview

Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut

VS

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)

Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut

425 Main St, Middletown, Connecticut, 06457, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.universalhealthct.org

Under the guidance of parent organization Connecticut Health Advancement and Research Trust (CHART), Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut is an independent, nonprofit, grant-making organization dedicated to achieving a quality health care system that is affordable and available for everyone in the state. We believe that health care is a fundamental right. Our grant-making program funds organizations that share our values and advance our mission. This work is part of a larger vision of social and economic justice for all.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)

undefined, Washington, DC, 20004, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.citizensforethics.org

At CREW, we use aggressive legal actions, in-depth investigations, and innovative policy and reform work to achieve that vision. We take on big fights against powerful opponents, from the President of the United States to wealthy dark money donors. Despite long odds, we continue to have victories large and small, thanks to our innovative legal strategies and unrelenting dedication.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universal-health-care-foundation-of-ct.jpeg
Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citizens-for-responsibility-and-ethics-in-washington-crew-.jpeg
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) in 2025.

Incident History — Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universal-health-care-foundation-of-ct.jpeg
Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citizens-for-responsibility-and-ethics-in-washington-crew-.jpeg
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut company.

In the current year, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company and Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company nor Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company nor Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company nor Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut company nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut company nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company employs more people globally than Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References