Comparison Overview

UnitedLex

VS

Gaynor Law Group, P.C.

UnitedLex

530 7th Ave, 707, New York, NY, US, 10018
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

UnitedLex is the preeminent business partner for legal delivering solutions that achieve value and drive growth for corporate legal departments and law firms in the areas of litigation and investigations, intellectual property, legal operations, contracts, and incident response. Founded in 2006, we co-create solutions that mitigate risk, drive revenue, and optimize business investment—transforming the legal function into a catalyst for success. Our team of 3,000+ legal and business professionals, data analysts, technologists, and engineers supports our clients from operational centers around the world.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2,024
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Gaynor Law Group, P.C.

11620 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90025, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Gaynor is a full-service transactional law firm that provides business and legal advice to clients across the country and across the world with a focus on Mergers & Acquisitions, Capital Markets, Commercial Real Estate, International Transactions, and Intellectual Property. Our clients range from technology start-ups to international investment funds and, regardless of size, are always our unconditional, top priority. Gaynor is committed to providing more than just legal services. We focus on building strong, long-lasting relationships with all of our clients by understanding their businesses and customizing our services to meet their unique needs.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitedlex.jpeg
UnitedLex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaynor-page-llp.jpeg
Gaynor Law Group, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UnitedLex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gaynor Law Group, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UnitedLex in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gaynor Law Group, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — UnitedLex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UnitedLex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gaynor Law Group, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gaynor Law Group, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitedlex.jpeg
UnitedLex
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaynor-page-llp.jpeg
Gaynor Law Group, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gaynor Law Group, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UnitedLex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UnitedLex company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gaynor Law Group, P.C. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gaynor Law Group, P.C. company and UnitedLex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gaynor Law Group, P.C. company nor UnitedLex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UnitedLex company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Gaynor Law Group, P.C. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gaynor Law Group, P.C. company nor UnitedLex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UnitedLex company nor Gaynor Law Group, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UnitedLex nor Gaynor Law Group, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither UnitedLex company nor Gaynor Law Group, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

UnitedLex company employs more people globally than Gaynor Law Group, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither UnitedLex nor Gaynor Law Group, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UnitedLex nor Gaynor Law Group, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UnitedLex nor Gaynor Law Group, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UnitedLex nor Gaynor Law Group, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UnitedLex nor Gaynor Law Group, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UnitedLex nor Gaynor Law Group, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X