Comparison Overview

UnitedHealth Group

VS

GE HealthCare

UnitedHealth Group

US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

UnitedHealth Group is a health care and well-being company with a mission to help people live healthier lives and help make the health system work better for everyone. We are 340,000 colleagues in two distinct and complementary businesses working to help build a modern, high-performing health system through improved access, affordability, outcomes and experiences. Optum delivers care aided by technology and data, empowering people, partners and providers with the guidance and tools they need to achieve better health. UnitedHealthcare offers a full range of health benefits, enabling affordable coverage, simplifying the health care experience and delivering access to high-quality care. We work with governments, employers, partners and providers to care for 147 million people and share a vision of a value-based system of care that provides compassionate and equitable care. At UnitedHealth Group, our mission calls us, our values guide us and our diverse culture connects us as we seek to improve care for the consumers we are privileged to serve and their communities. Click below to search careers or join our social communities: • Search & apply for careers at careers.unitedhealthgroup.com/ • Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/UnitedHealthGrp • Follow and like us on Facebook at facebook.com/unitedhealthgroup • Follow us on Instagram at instagram.com/unitedhealthgroup More about UnitedHealth Group can be found at unitedhealthgroup.com/

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 100,868
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
3

GE HealthCare

-, None, Chicago, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Every day millions of people feel the impact of our intelligent devices, advanced analytics and artificial intelligence. As a leading global medical technology and digital solutions innovator, GE HealthCare enables clinicians to make faster, more informed decisions through intelligent devices, data analytics, applications and services, supported by its Edison intelligence platform. With over 100 years of healthcare industry experience and around 50,000 employees globally, the company operates at the center of an ecosystem working toward precision health, digitizing healthcare, helping drive productivity and improve outcomes for patients, providers, health systems and researchers around the world. We embrace a culture of respect, transparency, integrity and diversity and we work to create a world where healthcare has no limits.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 57,635
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitedhealth-group.jpeg
UnitedHealth Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gehealthcare.jpeg
GE HealthCare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UnitedHealth Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GE HealthCare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

UnitedHealth Group has 138.1% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GE HealthCare in 2025.

Incident History — UnitedHealth Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UnitedHealth Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GE HealthCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GE HealthCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitedhealth-group.jpeg
UnitedHealth Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Physical Violence
Motivation: Protest against healthcare insurance claim denials, Criticism of healthcare companies' focus on profits over patient care
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gehealthcare.jpeg
GE HealthCare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GE HealthCare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UnitedHealth Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UnitedHealth Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GE HealthCare company has not reported any.

In the current year, UnitedHealth Group company has reported more cyber incidents than GE HealthCare company.

UnitedHealth Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while GE HealthCare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

UnitedHealth Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other GE HealthCare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

UnitedHealth Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while GE HealthCare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UnitedHealth Group company nor GE HealthCare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UnitedHealth Group nor GE HealthCare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GE HealthCare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UnitedHealth Group company.

UnitedHealth Group company employs more people globally than GE HealthCare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither UnitedHealth Group nor GE HealthCare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UnitedHealth Group nor GE HealthCare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UnitedHealth Group nor GE HealthCare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UnitedHealth Group nor GE HealthCare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UnitedHealth Group nor GE HealthCare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UnitedHealth Group nor GE HealthCare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N