Comparison Overview

United Way of Saginaw County

VS

Georgia English Bulldog Rescue

United Way of Saginaw County

100 S. Jefferson Ave., 3rd Floor, Saginaw, MI 48607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.UnitedWaySaginaw.org

Our mission: to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another. Our vision: to create a safe, nurturing community where all families can thrive. Saginaw County based nonprofit that works with the entire community to impact the areas of health, education and financial stability. Leveraging volunteers and community resources to improve the lives of others.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Georgia English Bulldog Rescue

PO Box 1097, Winder, GA, 30680, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799
http://www.georgiaenglishbulldogrescue.org

Our mission is to first ensure the safety and well-being of all English Bulldogs that we take in and second to educate the public in the care of English Bulldogs. We rehabilitate and re-home English Bulldogs that are sick, neglected, abused, or injured. Moreover, we provide a safe alternative to shelters for owners that are faced with the already difficult decision of finding a new home for their English bulldog. We have rescued more than 700 bulldogs since 2009. In 2019 alone, we rescued 92 bulldogs with vet costs exceeding $175,000. We have approximately 35 English Bulldogs in foster care at any given time. We are a 501(c)(3) corporation. We are in need of volunteers, donations, supplies and support. We rely solely on donations for the care and treatment of the rescued Bulldogs that are admitted to our organization.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-way-of-saginaw-county.jpeg
United Way of Saginaw County
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-english-bulldog-rescue.jpeg
Georgia English Bulldog Rescue
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Way of Saginaw County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Georgia English Bulldog Rescue
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Way of Saginaw County in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia English Bulldog Rescue in 2025.

Incident History — United Way of Saginaw County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Way of Saginaw County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Georgia English Bulldog Rescue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia English Bulldog Rescue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-way-of-saginaw-county.jpeg
United Way of Saginaw County
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-english-bulldog-rescue.jpeg
Georgia English Bulldog Rescue
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United Way of Saginaw County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Georgia English Bulldog Rescue company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Georgia English Bulldog Rescue company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Way of Saginaw County company.

In the current year, Georgia English Bulldog Rescue company and United Way of Saginaw County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Georgia English Bulldog Rescue company nor United Way of Saginaw County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Georgia English Bulldog Rescue company nor United Way of Saginaw County company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Georgia English Bulldog Rescue company nor United Way of Saginaw County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Way of Saginaw County company nor Georgia English Bulldog Rescue company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Way of Saginaw County nor Georgia English Bulldog Rescue holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United Way of Saginaw County company nor Georgia English Bulldog Rescue company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United Way of Saginaw County company employs more people globally than Georgia English Bulldog Rescue company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither United Way of Saginaw County nor Georgia English Bulldog Rescue holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Way of Saginaw County nor Georgia English Bulldog Rescue holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Way of Saginaw County nor Georgia English Bulldog Rescue holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Way of Saginaw County nor Georgia English Bulldog Rescue holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Way of Saginaw County nor Georgia English Bulldog Rescue holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Way of Saginaw County nor Georgia English Bulldog Rescue holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References