Comparison Overview

United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)

VS

Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee

United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)

4949 W Bethany Rd, North Little Rock, 72117, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

United Systems of Arkansas delivers more than thirty years experience to meet your printing & mailing goals. We supply Certified Mail® solutions for customers seeking rapid mail processing, document imaging and custom inserting. With our expertise in Certified Mail® processing and a patented system for protecting private data, we are the 100% solution™ for Certified Mail® services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee

2227 Southpark Drive, Murfreesboro, TN, 37128, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Franklin's Printing-Middle Tennessee specializes in full color printing, including business cards, brochures, newsletters, letterhead, envelopes, and custom presentation folders. We have two on-site graphic designers, as well as a full-service mail department in-house that allows us to efficiently design, print, and mail your promotional piece to your customers and prospects. We're thankful to serve customers all over Middle Tennessee from our offices in Murfreesboro and Nashville.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-systems-of-arkansas-inc.jpeg
United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklin's-printing-middle-tennessee.jpeg
Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee in 2025.

Incident History — United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-systems-of-arkansas-inc.jpeg
United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklin's-printing-middle-tennessee.jpeg
Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company.

In the current year, Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company and United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company nor United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company nor United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company nor United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company employs more people globally than Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N