Comparison Overview

United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)

VS

Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company

United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)

4949 W Bethany Rd, North Little Rock, 72117, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.unitedsystems.net

United Systems of Arkansas delivers more than thirty years experience to meet your printing & mailing goals. We supply Certified Mail® solutions for customers seeking rapid mail processing, document imaging and custom inserting. With our expertise in Certified Mail® processing and a patented system for protecting private data, we are the 100% solution™ for Certified Mail® services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company

5300 N. Channel Ave., Portland, Oregon, 97217, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bridgetown.com

Bridgetown Printing of Portland, Oregon is a full-service Portland union printing facility that specializes in high-end sheetfed offset & digital printing with complete bindery, mailing and fulfillment services, but we go beyond the traditional definition of a commercial printer. As a part of the RR Donnelley network, we create value by delivering end-to-end print production and management solutions that are based on the needs of our customers to fuel growth, reduce costs and mitigate risks. How could you leverage our network and unparalleled capabilities to create value for your organization?

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-systems-of-arkansas-inc.jpeg
United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgetown-printing.jpeg
Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company in 2025.

Incident History — United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-systems-of-arkansas-inc.jpeg
United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgetown-printing.jpeg
Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company.

In the current year, Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company and United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company nor United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company nor United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company nor United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company employs more people globally than United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Systems Of Arkansas (formerly USA Images) nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References