Comparison Overview

U.S. DOGE Service

VS

City of Philadelphia

U.S. DOGE Service

725 17th St NW, Washington, DC, US, 20006
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://usds.gov

*U.S. DOGE Service operated under the name U.S. Digital Service prior to January 20, 2025. The U.S. DOGE Service (USDS) is a group of mission-driven professionals passionate about delivering better government services to the public. Millions of people interact with government services every day. Veterans apply for benefits. Students compare financial aid options. Small business owners seek loans. Too often, outdated tools and complicated systems make these interactions cumbersome and frustrating. Enter USDS. We collaborate with public servants throughout the government to help deliver a better government experience to people. We bring best practices from various disciplines, including engineering, product, design, procurement, data science, operations, talent, and communications. Coming from a range of cultural, geographical, and ethnic backgrounds, USDSers—as we call ourselves—represent a myriad of intersecting identities, just like the people we serve. We're curious about understanding people's needs and are excited to use our short tours of service to make a positive impact. We hire talented professionals for tours of services ranging from three months up to four years, but the average length of service is about two years. Will you join us? Click the Learn More button to apply.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

City of Philadelphia

City Hall, None, Philadelphia, PA, US, 19102
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 650 and 699
http://www.phila.gov

With a workforce of 30,000 people, and opportunities in 1,000 different job categories, the City of Philadelphia is one of the largest employers in Southeastern Pennsylvania. As an employer, we operate through the guiding principles of service, integrity, respect, accountability, collaboration, diversity and inclusion. We strive to effectively deliver services, to resolve the challenges facing our city, and to make Philadelphia a place where all of our residents have the opportunity to reach their potential. To learn more about job opportunities, visit www.phila.gov or follow #PHLCityJobs.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,387
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-doge-service.jpeg
U.S. DOGE Service
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-philadelphia.jpeg
City of Philadelphia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
U.S. DOGE Service
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Philadelphia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

U.S. DOGE Service has 43.82% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Philadelphia in 2026.

Incident History — U.S. DOGE Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. DOGE Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Philadelphia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Philadelphia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-doge-service.jpeg
U.S. DOGE Service
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Political (Election Challenge)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-philadelphia.jpeg
City of Philadelphia
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Cyberattack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

City of Philadelphia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to U.S. DOGE Service company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Philadelphia company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to U.S. DOGE Service company.

In the current year, U.S. DOGE Service company has reported more cyber incidents than City of Philadelphia company.

Neither City of Philadelphia company nor U.S. DOGE Service company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both City of Philadelphia company and U.S. DOGE Service company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither City of Philadelphia company nor U.S. DOGE Service company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither U.S. DOGE Service company nor City of Philadelphia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither U.S. DOGE Service nor City of Philadelphia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Philadelphia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to U.S. DOGE Service company.

City of Philadelphia company employs more people globally than U.S. DOGE Service company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither U.S. DOGE Service nor City of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither U.S. DOGE Service nor City of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither U.S. DOGE Service nor City of Philadelphia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither U.S. DOGE Service nor City of Philadelphia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither U.S. DOGE Service nor City of Philadelphia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither U.S. DOGE Service nor City of Philadelphia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References