Comparison Overview

UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED

VS

Mondelēz International

UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED

UB TOWER, BANGALORE, Karnataka, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED is a food production company based out of UB TOWER, BANGALORE, Karnataka, India.

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 968
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mondelēz International

Mondelēz International, Greater Chicago Area, IL, US, 60607
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Mondelēz International, Inc. (NASDAQ: MDLZ) is an American multinational confectionery, food, and beverage company based in Illinois which employs approximately 80,000 individuals around the world. Our Purpose Our purpose is to empower people to snack right. We will lead the future of snacking around the world by offering the right snack, for the right moment, made the right way. Our Brands We’re leading the future of snacking with iconic brands such as Oreo, belVita and LU biscuits; Cadbury Dairy Milk, Milka and Toblerone chocolate; Sour Patch Kids candy and Trident gum. Our People Our 80,000+ colleagues around the world are key to the success of our business. Our Values and Leadership Commitments of Love our Consumers and Brands, Grow Every Day, and Do What's Right shapes our culture – what we believe in, stand for, and what guides our actions and decisions. Great people and great brands. That’s who we are. Our Strategies We are uniquely positioned to lead the future of snacking with strong leadership in our categories, an unparalleled portfolio of global and local brands and a solid footprint in fast-growing markets. Aimed at delivering sustainable growth, our strategic plan is centered around three strategic priorities: • Growth: accelerate consumer-centric growth • Execution: drive operational excellence • Culture: build a winning growth culture

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition: Food Manufacturing
Employees: 44,433
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-spirits-limited.jpeg
UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mondelezinternational.jpeg
Mondelēz International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mondelēz International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mondelēz International in 2025.

Incident History — UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mondelēz International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mondelēz International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-spirits-limited.jpeg
UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mondelezinternational.jpeg
Mondelēz International
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Network exploit
Motivation: Destruction
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malware (NotPetya)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Mondelēz International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mondelēz International company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED company has not reported any.

In the current year, Mondelēz International company and UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Mondelēz International company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mondelēz International company nor UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Mondelēz International company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED company nor Mondelēz International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED nor Mondelēz International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mondelēz International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED company.

Mondelēz International company employs more people globally than UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Manufacturing.

Neither UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED nor Mondelēz International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED nor Mondelēz International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED nor Mondelēz International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED nor Mondelēz International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED nor Mondelēz International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UNITED SPIRITS LIMITED nor Mondelēz International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H