Comparison Overview

United Print. Signs. Graphics.

VS

BMS Direct, Inc.

United Print. Signs. Graphics.

1515 Central Ave S, Kent, Washington, 98032, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

How you want it, when you want it. Business cards, flyers, brochures, postcards, posters, signs, environmental graphics, vehicle wraps, digital signage (LED), CAD plotting/construction signage, custom print portal service/business asset management & more! Serving the Puget Sound area since 1999. We attribute our continuing success to the caliber of the staff and team that serve you every day at United. That's because each and every person at United Print. Signs. Graphics. is dedicated to creating a new service standard, to ensure your projects are delivered on-time, on-budget and to your complete satisfaction. And we will Bend Over Backwards to prove it to you! What does our Bend Over Backwards service guarantee mean to YOU? Without fail, we promise to put every project we work on through a multistep process that starts from the moment you contact us to the second your project is delivered or installed. We will do whatever it takes to represent the highest standard of service in the industry. When we launched our business, we earned the trust and loyalty of our customers by communicating with honesty and integrity. These are the hallmarks of our company. And we welcome working with you to exceed expectations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BMS Direct, Inc.

37 Millrace Drive, Lynchburg, VA, 24502, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

BMS Direct is a nationwide service provider of high-quality direct marketing solutions, delivering cost-effective communications to your target market. We offer a one-stop solution for our client’s, from graphic design, mailing services, and printing, to our recent additions such as promotional products, branded apparel, and web to print capabilities. Our mission is to provide solutions that bring value to our customers in order to drive results.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-reprographics.jpeg
United Print. Signs. Graphics.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bms-direct-inc..jpeg
BMS Direct, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Print. Signs. Graphics.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BMS Direct, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Print. Signs. Graphics. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BMS Direct, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — United Print. Signs. Graphics. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Print. Signs. Graphics. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BMS Direct, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BMS Direct, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-reprographics.jpeg
United Print. Signs. Graphics.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bms-direct-inc..jpeg
BMS Direct, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both United Print. Signs. Graphics. company and BMS Direct, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, BMS Direct, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Print. Signs. Graphics. company.

In the current year, BMS Direct, Inc. company and United Print. Signs. Graphics. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. company nor United Print. Signs. Graphics. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. company nor United Print. Signs. Graphics. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BMS Direct, Inc. company nor United Print. Signs. Graphics. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Print. Signs. Graphics. company nor BMS Direct, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Print. Signs. Graphics. nor BMS Direct, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United Print. Signs. Graphics. company nor BMS Direct, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BMS Direct, Inc. company employs more people globally than United Print. Signs. Graphics. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither United Print. Signs. Graphics. nor BMS Direct, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Print. Signs. Graphics. nor BMS Direct, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Print. Signs. Graphics. nor BMS Direct, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Print. Signs. Graphics. nor BMS Direct, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Print. Signs. Graphics. nor BMS Direct, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Print. Signs. Graphics. nor BMS Direct, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N