Comparison Overview

United Performing Arts Fund

VS

Dry July Foundation

United Performing Arts Fund

301 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

United Performing Arts Fund's mission is to secure community resources, promote the performing arts as a regional asset and improve the quality of life through responsible investment in and financial support of the performing arts in Southeastern Wisconsin. Our vision is to shape a diverse, vibrant and sustainable cultural life for all. As an umbrella organization, UPAF supports a breadth of performing arts groups that collectively offer something for everyone through its 14 Member Groups and 41 Affiliates. More than one million people are touched each year through performances, educational outreach, special events and community partnerships. Member Groups: Bel Canto Chorus Black Arts MKE Danceworks, Inc. First Stage Florentine Opera Company Milwaukee Ballet Milwaukee Chamber Theatre Milwaukee Repertory Theater Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra Milwaukee Youth Symphony Orchestra Next Act Theatre Present Music Renaissance Theaterworks Skylight Music Theatre

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dry July Foundation

Suite 705, Milsons Point, NSW, 2061, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

Dry July Foundation is the registered charity behind the Dry July campaign. We are dedicated to improving the comfort, care and wellbeing of people affected by cancer. Since the first Dry July in 2008, the Dry July campaign has raised over $90 million dollars for people affected by cancer. Funds raised through the Dry July campaign are distributed to cancer organisations across Australia. These local and national organisations provide practical, tangible support for cancer patients, their families and carers. Like the Dry July Foundation, these organisations depend on the generosity of the community through campaigns like Dry July.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-performing-arts-fund.jpeg
United Performing Arts Fund
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dry-july.jpeg
Dry July Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Performing Arts Fund
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dry July Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Performing Arts Fund in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dry July Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — United Performing Arts Fund (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Performing Arts Fund cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dry July Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dry July Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-performing-arts-fund.jpeg
United Performing Arts Fund
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dry-july.jpeg
Dry July Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United Performing Arts Fund company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dry July Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dry July Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Performing Arts Fund company.

In the current year, Dry July Foundation company and United Performing Arts Fund company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dry July Foundation company nor United Performing Arts Fund company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dry July Foundation company nor United Performing Arts Fund company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dry July Foundation company nor United Performing Arts Fund company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Performing Arts Fund company nor Dry July Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Performing Arts Fund nor Dry July Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United Performing Arts Fund company nor Dry July Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United Performing Arts Fund company employs more people globally than Dry July Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither United Performing Arts Fund nor Dry July Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Performing Arts Fund nor Dry July Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Performing Arts Fund nor Dry July Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Performing Arts Fund nor Dry July Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Performing Arts Fund nor Dry July Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Performing Arts Fund nor Dry July Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N