Comparison Overview

United Furniture Company

VS

House of Denmark

United Furniture Company

ulica Komorowska, Pruszków, Woj. Mazowieckie, 05-806, PL
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

UFC is a company based on more than twenty years of experience in selling polish furniture to B2B customers around the world. The diversity of our products combined with competitive prices and quality allow us to satisfy even the most demanding clients. We invite you to browse through our website and contact us in order to get an offer matched to your needs.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

House of Denmark

12910 Olive Blvd, Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

House of Denmark is the leading retailer of contemporary, Scandinavian, and European furniture in the Midwest, has been owned and operated by Danes since its opening in 1977. We specialize in furnishings for home and office with a large selection for every room; we also feature area rugs, lamps and accessories. With two locations in St. Louis; one on Olive and one on Tesson Ferry Road; please visit our stores or call us for more information.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-furniture-company.jpeg
United Furniture Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/house-of-denmark.jpeg
House of Denmark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Furniture Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
House of Denmark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Furniture Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for House of Denmark in 2025.

Incident History — United Furniture Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Furniture Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — House of Denmark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

House of Denmark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-furniture-company.jpeg
United Furniture Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/house-of-denmark.jpeg
House of Denmark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

House of Denmark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to United Furniture Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, House of Denmark company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Furniture Company company.

In the current year, House of Denmark company and United Furniture Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither House of Denmark company nor United Furniture Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither House of Denmark company nor United Furniture Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither House of Denmark company nor United Furniture Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Furniture Company company nor House of Denmark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Furniture Company nor House of Denmark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United Furniture Company company nor House of Denmark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United Furniture Company company employs more people globally than House of Denmark company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither United Furniture Company nor House of Denmark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Furniture Company nor House of Denmark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Furniture Company nor House of Denmark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Furniture Company nor House of Denmark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Furniture Company nor House of Denmark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Furniture Company nor House of Denmark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.