Comparison Overview

United for a Fair Economy

VS

SGS Economics and Planning

United for a Fair Economy

184 High Street, Boston, 02110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

National organization committed to fighting inequality in the United States. We support grassroots groups around the country by building a shared analysis, connecting the dots between movements, and challenging cultural narratives. Program areas include Popular Economics Education; policy ideas to correct the racial wealth divide; federal tax fairness; the state-based Inclusive Economy Network (a network of grassroots organizations working to pass progressive tax and economic policies); and Responsible Wealth (network of affluent advocates of progressive economic policies).

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SGS Economics and Planning

222 Exhibition St, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

SGS Economics and Planning is an employee-owned public policy adviser and certified B Corp. Our evidence-based insights help government, business and community leaders understand how places and economies function, assess what projects and programs work, and plan future places and precincts. Beyond advisory services, we hold workshops and courses to share knowledge collaboratively. Visit our website to find out more. Follow our LinkedIn page to stay in touch.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 70
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-for-a-fair-economy.jpeg
United for a Fair Economy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sgs-economics-and-planning.jpeg
SGS Economics and Planning
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United for a Fair Economy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SGS Economics and Planning
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United for a Fair Economy in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SGS Economics and Planning in 2025.

Incident History — United for a Fair Economy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United for a Fair Economy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SGS Economics and Planning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SGS Economics and Planning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-for-a-fair-economy.jpeg
United for a Fair Economy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sgs-economics-and-planning.jpeg
SGS Economics and Planning
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both United for a Fair Economy company and SGS Economics and Planning company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, SGS Economics and Planning company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United for a Fair Economy company.

In the current year, SGS Economics and Planning company and United for a Fair Economy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SGS Economics and Planning company nor United for a Fair Economy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SGS Economics and Planning company nor United for a Fair Economy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SGS Economics and Planning company nor United for a Fair Economy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United for a Fair Economy company nor SGS Economics and Planning company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United for a Fair Economy nor SGS Economics and Planning holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United for a Fair Economy company nor SGS Economics and Planning company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SGS Economics and Planning company employs more people globally than United for a Fair Economy company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither United for a Fair Economy nor SGS Economics and Planning holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United for a Fair Economy nor SGS Economics and Planning holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United for a Fair Economy nor SGS Economics and Planning holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United for a Fair Economy nor SGS Economics and Planning holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United for a Fair Economy nor SGS Economics and Planning holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United for a Fair Economy nor SGS Economics and Planning holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H