Comparison Overview

United Electric Controls

VS

Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES)

United Electric Controls

180 Dexter Avenue, Watertown, MA, 02472, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1931 United Electric Controls (UEC), and its divisions, Applied Sensor Technologies and Precision Sensors, is a privately held corporation headquartered in Watertown, Massachusetts, USA. UEC is a manufacturer of durable and reliable WirelessHART gas detectors; pressure, temperature, vacuum, electromechanical and electronic smart switches; safety transmitters; controls; and sensors. Focused on providing protection to equipment, processes, and personnel in a variety of industrial applications, our products range from simple units to highly specialized custom designs. Many UEC products perform industrial alarm and emergency shutdown functions for our global customers, while others provide critical sensor inputs into their control systems. Our reputation for dependable, reliable products is a result of innovative design, superior manufacturing processes, and a corporate focus on uncompromising quality.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES)

W238N1800 Rockwood Drive, Waukesha, WI, 53188, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

For over three decades, Midwest Engineered Systems (MWES) has been transforming manufacturing with cutting-edge 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙧𝙤𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙨 𝙨𝙤𝙡𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨. What started as a small team of engineers in 1991 has grown into a 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙧, delivering 4,000+ innovative solutions across industries like aerospace, automotive, medical, food & beverage, and more. At MWES, we believe automation should 𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘹𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺—all while being adaptable to evolving manufacturing needs. Our team of 150+ engineers and automation specialists designs and integrates custom automation systems, robotic solutions, and advanced web handling technologies to help businesses—from startups to global enterprises—achieve seamless production. 🔹 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐧𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐌𝐖𝐄𝐒? ✅ Expertise in custom automation & system integration ✅ Solutions tailored to your production challenges ✅ End-to-end automation services—from concept to installation ✅ Experience with leading robotic brands: ABB, Fanuc, KUKA, and more At MWES, we don’t just automate—we innovate. Let’s build the future of manufacturing together. Visit www.mwes.com to explore how we can transform your operations.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-electric-controls.jpeg
United Electric Controls
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/midwest-engineered-systems-group.jpeg
Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Electric Controls
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Electric Controls in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) in 2025.

Incident History — United Electric Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Electric Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-electric-controls.jpeg
United Electric Controls
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/midwest-engineered-systems-group.jpeg
Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both United Electric Controls company and Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Electric Controls company.

In the current year, Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) company and United Electric Controls company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) company nor United Electric Controls company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) company nor United Electric Controls company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) company nor United Electric Controls company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Electric Controls company nor Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Electric Controls nor Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United Electric Controls company nor Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) company employs more people globally than United Electric Controls company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither United Electric Controls nor Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Electric Controls nor Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Electric Controls nor Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Electric Controls nor Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Electric Controls nor Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Electric Controls nor Midwest Engineered Systems Inc. (MWES) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H