Comparison Overview

United Dance

VS

Atlanta Chamber Players

United Dance

Barrett Street, Derby, Derbyshire, DE24 0EN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://united-dance.com

Based in Alvaston, Derby, United Dance offers lessons in pre-school, ballet, tap, modern and jazz to all ages of the community. Our aim is to provide a high quality of dance tuition in a safe, fun environment. All students are treated as individuals whether they want to learn dance for fun, to gain confidence or towards a possible future career in dance, United Dance will tailor each student's training to their needs. All students benefit from small class sizes allowing them to achieve their full potential. Whilst treating all students as individuals we also believe in giving everyone the same opportunities and welcome those of all abilities and with all levels of experience into the school. No matter what age you are it's never too late to learn to dance with United Dance.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Atlanta Chamber Players

PO Box 20013, Atlanta, GA, 30325, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.atlantachamberplayers.com

The Atlanta Chamber Players, a mixed ensemble of strings, winds and piano, were founded in 1976. The ensemble has earned a national reputation as a pioneer among chamber music groups and is widely respected among arts organizations in the Southeast. For over four decades, the ACP has performed critically acclaimed concerts in cities throughout the United States, Europe and Mexico and reached millions worldwide through live international radio broadcasts. The ACP’s broad repertoire includes traditional masterpieces (Beethoven, Brahms) as well as contemporary classics (Crumb, Messiaen). ACP also has a long-standing commitment to performing the music of living American composers. The ensemble has premiered more than 125 works to Atlanta audiences, including world premieres commissioned from composers such as Michael Gandolfi, David Amram, Anne LeBaron, Adam Schoenberg, and two works from Pulitzer-Prizewinner John Harbison.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-dance.jpeg
United Dance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-chamber-players.jpeg
Atlanta Chamber Players
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Dance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlanta Chamber Players
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Dance in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Chamber Players in 2025.

Incident History — United Dance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Dance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlanta Chamber Players (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Chamber Players cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-dance.jpeg
United Dance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-chamber-players.jpeg
Atlanta Chamber Players
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United Dance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlanta Chamber Players company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Atlanta Chamber Players company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to United Dance company.

In the current year, Atlanta Chamber Players company and United Dance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlanta Chamber Players company nor United Dance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlanta Chamber Players company nor United Dance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlanta Chamber Players company nor United Dance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Dance company nor Atlanta Chamber Players company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Dance nor Atlanta Chamber Players holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United Dance company nor Atlanta Chamber Players company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United Dance company employs more people globally than Atlanta Chamber Players company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither United Dance nor Atlanta Chamber Players holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Dance nor Atlanta Chamber Players holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Dance nor Atlanta Chamber Players holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Dance nor Atlanta Chamber Players holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Dance nor Atlanta Chamber Players holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Dance nor Atlanta Chamber Players holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References