Comparison Overview

United by Music

VS

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)

United by Music

Postbus 245, Sliedrecht, 3360AE, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Imagine a world in which no prejudice exists based upon race, creed, color—or intellectual capacity. That is the world that we at United by Music, and our growing support base, envision. In our case, we have turned to the power of music to bring people together. United by Music is a non-profit organization that supports musically talented people with intellectual disabilities and gives them a chance to perform on stage. We aim to improve the quality of life for the artists and challenge public attitudes about people with intellectual disabilities, showing that we are more alike than we are different by profiling the exceptional talents of these extraordinary people. United by Music is an international organization and currently has a basis in the Netherlands (www.unitedbymusic.nl) and North America (www.ubmna.org).

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)

137 Hospital Drive, None, Fort Walton Beach, Florida, US, 32548
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Through compassionate care and clinical excellence, Bridgeway Center Inc. (BCI) is dedicated to servicing the behavioral health needs of Okaloosa County residents. We are committed to the wellness of individuals, families, and the community through prevention, intervention, treatment, and support. We offer a full spectrum of outpatient services in a warm and inviting atmosphere.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-by-music.jpeg
United by Music
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgewaycenterinc.jpeg
Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United by Music
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United by Music in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) in 2026.

Incident History — United by Music (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United by Music cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-by-music.jpeg
United by Music
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgewaycenterinc.jpeg
Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

United by Music company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas United by Music company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company and United by Music company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company nor United by Music company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while United by Music company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company nor United by Music company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United by Music company nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United by Music nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither United by Music company nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company employs more people globally than United by Music company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither United by Music nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United by Music nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United by Music nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United by Music nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United by Music nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United by Music nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N