Comparison Overview

United Airlines

VS

SpiceJet Limited

United Airlines

233 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

This is the story of airline that leads the industry from ground to clouds. Our global cast of over 100,000+ hero characters are each on a journey to be a force for good for our customers, the planet and each other. Come be part of this story.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 68,742
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

SpiceJet Limited

319, Udyog Vihar,, Phase 4, Gurgaon, Haryana, IN, 122016
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 700 and 749

Red. Hot. Spicy. That’s not just our tagline, it’s how we fly. Red reflects the bold spirit we bring to every journey, energetic, passionate, and full of heart. Hot captures the warmth of our service and the vibrant destinations we connect. Spicy is our drive to keep travel exciting through innovation and industry-firsts. Since 2005, SpiceJet has been shaping India’s aviation journey, connecting people, places, and possibilities. We pioneered regional air connectivity under the UDAN scheme, making air travel more accessible across the country. We led several industry-firsts, including India’s first biofuel-powered flight, the first seaplane, and in-flight entertainment on personal devices. Our premium economy product, SpiceMax, brings added comfort, priority services, and hot meals, redefining low-cost travel. At SpiceJet, we fly with passion, powered by people, always Red. Hot. Spicy.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 10,722
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-airlines.jpeg
United Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spicejet-limited.jpeg
SpiceJet Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SpiceJet Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Airlines in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SpiceJet Limited in 2025.

Incident History — United Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SpiceJet Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SpiceJet Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-airlines.jpeg
United Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Account Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spicejet-limited.jpeg
SpiceJet Limited
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

United Airlines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SpiceJet Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

United Airlines and SpiceJet Limited have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, SpiceJet Limited company and United Airlines company have not reported any cyber incidents.

SpiceJet Limited company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while United Airlines company has not reported such incidents publicly.

United Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SpiceJet Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SpiceJet Limited company nor United Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Airlines company nor SpiceJet Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Airlines nor SpiceJet Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

United Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SpiceJet Limited company.

United Airlines company employs more people globally than SpiceJet Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither United Airlines nor SpiceJet Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Airlines nor SpiceJet Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Airlines nor SpiceJet Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Airlines nor SpiceJet Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Airlines nor SpiceJet Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Airlines nor SpiceJet Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N