Comparison Overview

United Airlines

VS

GOL Linhas Aéreas

United Airlines

233 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

This is the story of airline that leads the industry from ground to clouds. Our global cast of over 100,000+ hero characters are each on a journey to be a force for good for our customers, the planet and each other. Come be part of this story.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 68,742
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

GOL Linhas Aéreas

Pça Comandante Linneu Gomes, Portaria 3, São Paulo, SP, BR, 04626-900
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Somos a maior Companhia Aérea do País e estamos entre as que mais crescem no mundo. A nossa história começou em 2001 e, desde então, somos responsáveis por inovar o mercado da aviação no Brasil. Tudo isso graças à dedicação do nosso Time para garantir o nosso Valor número 1, a Segurança, entregando sempre a melhor experiência em voar. Carregamos em nossa bagagem o respeito para promover a diversidade e a inclusão em nosso ambiente de trabalho, valorizando o talento das nossas Águias e seguindo nosso propósito de ser a Primeira para Todos, seja no solo ou no céu. Além disso, criamos uma série de facilidades que tornam as viagens dos nossos Clientes ainda mais tranquilas, como: Novo App, Selfie Check-in, GOL+ Conforto, Programa de fidelidade da Smiles e Entretenimento a bordo. Com a laranjinha, você voa mais alto e leva a nossa essência Simples, Humana e Inteligente em todas as decolagens.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 16,049
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-airlines.jpeg
United Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gol.jpeg
GOL Linhas Aéreas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GOL Linhas Aéreas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Airlines in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GOL Linhas Aéreas in 2025.

Incident History — United Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GOL Linhas Aéreas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GOL Linhas Aéreas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-airlines.jpeg
United Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Account Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gol.jpeg
GOL Linhas Aéreas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GOL Linhas Aéreas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to United Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

United Airlines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GOL Linhas Aéreas company has not reported any.

In the current year, GOL Linhas Aéreas company and United Airlines company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GOL Linhas Aéreas company nor United Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

United Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other GOL Linhas Aéreas company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GOL Linhas Aéreas company nor United Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Airlines company nor GOL Linhas Aéreas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Airlines nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

United Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GOL Linhas Aéreas company.

United Airlines company employs more people globally than GOL Linhas Aéreas company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither United Airlines nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Airlines nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Airlines nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Airlines nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Airlines nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Airlines nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N