Comparison Overview

United Airlines

VS

avianca

United Airlines

233 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

This is the story of airline that leads the industry from ground to clouds. Our global cast of over 100,000+ hero characters are each on a journey to be a force for good for our customers, the planet and each other. Come be part of this story.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 68,742
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

avianca

Avenida Calle 26 59-15, Bogotá, CO
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

!BIenvenido al sitio oficial! Avianca es la primera aerolínea comercial fundada en las Américas y la segunda en el mundo. Enfocados en alcanzar la excelencia y eficiencia operacional, se dio marcha a una profunda reorganización de los procesos, la cual ha estado acompañada de la modernización y renovación de la flota de aeronaves, la adopción de las mejores prácticas de la industria y el desarrollo de una intensa campaña por el mejoramiento de la cultura interna de servicio. Nos proponemos ahora fortalecer el posicionamiento de la compañía en los diversos mercados a través de la entrega de un servicio superior. Por eso, la trayectoria, el profesionalismo y la experiencia de varias generaciones de hombres y mujeres que por décadas le han dado vida a Avianca, TACA, AeroGal y Tampa Cargo, constituyen ahora nuestra inspiración para convertir la nueva Avianca en el aliado ideal para sus viajes. Avianca acepta los comentarios y quejas que se reciban por este medio pero no podrá dar respuesta a todas éstas. Para asegurar una respuesta adecuada a sus quejas o comentarios, por favor envíelas a Centro Administrativo Avianca - Relaciones con el Cliente, Avenida calle 26 No. 59-15 Bogotá, Colombia o ingréselas a través de http://www.avianca.com/PiedePagina/Contactenos/es/Sugerencias-Reclamos.htm Bogotá: (571)4013434 Resto del país: 1-8000-953434 Código de Ética y Normas de Conductas de los Negocios de Avianca Holdings S.A.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 13,417
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-airlines.jpeg
United Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avianca.jpeg
avianca
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
United Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
avianca
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Airlines in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for avianca in 2025.

Incident History — United Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — avianca (X = Date, Y = Severity)

avianca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-airlines.jpeg
United Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Account Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avianca.jpeg
avianca
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

avianca company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to United Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

United Airlines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas avianca company has not reported any.

In the current year, avianca company and United Airlines company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither avianca company nor United Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

United Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other avianca company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither avianca company nor United Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither United Airlines company nor avianca company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither United Airlines nor avianca holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

United Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to avianca company.

United Airlines company employs more people globally than avianca company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither United Airlines nor avianca holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither United Airlines nor avianca holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither United Airlines nor avianca holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither United Airlines nor avianca holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither United Airlines nor avianca holds HIPAA certification.

Neither United Airlines nor avianca holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H