Comparison Overview

Unisyn Voting Solutions

VS

NVIDIA

Unisyn Voting Solutions

2310 COUSTEAU CT VISTA, CA 92081-8346, US
Last Update: 2025-03-17 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Unisyn Voting Solutions is dedicated to helping government institutions optimize their election programs and provide best-in-class service to their jurisdictions and precincts. Our innovative approach enables us to deliver election systems and products which are secure, auditable, flexible, and provide transparency. Unisyn is will be the ONLY Company to obtain 2005 VVSG Certification based on the requirements set forth by the United States Election Assistance Commission for our digital scanning voting systems which are built on a hardened Linux and Java platform.

NAICS: 3341
NAICS Definition: Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 11-50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NVIDIA

2701 San Tomas Expressway, None, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95050
Last Update: 2025-08-09 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Since its founding in 1993, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been a pioneer in accelerated computing. The companyโ€™s invention of the GPU in 1999 sparked the growth of the PC gaming market, redefined computer graphics, ignited the era of modern AI and is fueling the creation of the metaverse. NVIDIA is now a full-stack computing company with data-center-scale offerings that are reshaping industry.

NAICS: 3341
NAICS Definition: Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 41,594
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unisyn-voting-solutions.jpeg
Unisyn Voting Solutions
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvidia.jpeg
NVIDIA
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Unisyn Voting Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NVIDIA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unisyn Voting Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

NVIDIA has 986.96% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” Unisyn Voting Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unisyn Voting Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” NVIDIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NVIDIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unisyn-voting-solutions.jpeg
Unisyn Voting Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nvidia.jpeg
NVIDIA
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution (RCE) via shared memory manipulation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Rowhammer, Bluetooth Exploits, Phishing, Data Theft
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local access with low privileges needed to exploit vulnerabilities via specially crafted files
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NVIDIA company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Unisyn Voting Solutions company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

NVIDIA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Unisyn Voting Solutions company has not reported any.

In the current year, NVIDIA company has reported more cyber incidents than Unisyn Voting Solutions company.

Neither NVIDIA company nor Unisyn Voting Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NVIDIA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Unisyn Voting Solutions company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NVIDIA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Unisyn Voting Solutions company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NVIDIA company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Unisyn Voting Solutions company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NVIDIA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Unisyn Voting Solutions company.

NVIDIA company employs more people globally than Unisyn Voting Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X