Comparison Overview

UNISUL

VS

Virginia Tech

UNISUL

Rua José Acácio Moreira 787 Tubarão, SC 88704900, BR
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

A Unisul, criada 1964, como uma universidade comunitária, sem fins lucrativos. Tem como um dos seus grandes objetivos preparar as novas gerações, sendo um instrumento de inovação e de apoio às mudanças da sociedade, apostando nas parcerias e alianças com instituições de ensino do mundo inteiro. Possui 3 campi e 7 unidades em várias cidades de sua área de abrangência: Campus Universitário de Tubarão (1992) - Unidade Universitária de Tubarão - Unidade Universitária de Araranguá - Unidade Universitária de Braço do Norte - Unidade Universitária de Içara - Unidade Universitária de Imbituba

NAICS: 611
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,001-5,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Virginia Tech

800 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US
Last Update: 2025-05-05 (UTC)

Good

Between 700 and 800

Dedicated to its motto, Ut Prosim (That I May Serve), Virginia Tech takes a hands-on, engaging approach to education, preparing scholars to be leaders in their fields and communities. As the commonwealth’s most comprehensive university and its leading research institution, Virginia Tech offers 215 undergraduate and graduate degree programs to 31,000 students and manages a research portfolio of $450 million. The university fulfills its land-grant mission of transforming knowledge to practice through technological leadership and by fueling economic growth and job creation locally, regionally, and across Virginia.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 15,319
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unisul.jpeg
UNISUL
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-tech.jpeg
Virginia Tech
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
UNISUL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Virginia Tech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNISUL in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Virginia Tech in 2025.

Incident History — UNISUL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNISUL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Virginia Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virginia Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unisul.jpeg
UNISUL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-tech.jpeg
Virginia Tech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UNISUL company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Virginia Tech company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Virginia Tech company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to UNISUL company.

In the current year, Virginia Tech company and UNISUL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Virginia Tech company nor UNISUL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Virginia Tech company nor UNISUL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Virginia Tech company nor UNISUL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UNISUL company nor Virginia Tech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UNISUL company nor Virginia Tech company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Virginia Tech company employs more people globally than UNISUL company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.