Comparison Overview

Gruppo Unipol

VS

Gallagher

Gruppo Unipol

Via Stalingrado 45 Bologna, Italy 40128, IT
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.unipol.com

Unipol Group is one of the leading insurance groups in Europe and the leader in Italy in Non-Life business (particularly in Motor and Health), with total premium income of 15.1 billion euros, including 8.7 billion in Non-Life business and 6.4 billion in Life business (2023 figures). Unipol adopts an integrated offering strategy and covers the full range of insurance products, operating mainly through its subsidiary UnipolSai Assicurazioni. The Group is also active in direct auto insurance (Linear Assicurazioni), transport and aviation insurance (Siat), health protection (UniSalute), supplementary pensions, and oversees the bancassurance channel (Arca Vita and Arca Assicurazioni). It also manages significant diversified activities in the real estate, hotel (UNA Group), health care (Centro Medico Santagostino) and agricultural (Tenute del Cerro) sectors. Unipol Gruppo S.p.A. is listed on the Italian stock exchange.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gallagher

2850 Golf Road, Rolling Meadows, 60008, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://linktr.ee/GallagherGlobal

Gallagher, a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting firm, serves communities around the globe, helping clients address risk, protecting assets, and recovering from losses. The products and services we provide keep businesses and institutions running, and enable individuals and families to face their future with confidence. Gallagher provides retail and wholesale property and casualty brokerage, alternative risk transfer services, employee benefit consulting, and actuarial services. Gallagher also offers claims and information management, risk control consulting and appraisal services, human resource consulting, and retirement services. Follow us on social: Instagram: http://instagram.com/gallagherglobal Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/GallagherGlobal Twitter: https://twitter.com/GallagherGlobal YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/GallagherGlobal

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 46,421
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unipol-gruppo.jpeg
Gruppo Unipol
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagher-global.jpeg
Gallagher
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gruppo Unipol
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gallagher
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gruppo Unipol in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallagher in 2026.

Incident History — Gruppo Unipol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gruppo Unipol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gallagher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallagher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unipol-gruppo.jpeg
Gruppo Unipol
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagher-global.jpeg
Gallagher
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Gruppo Unipol company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gallagher company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Gallagher company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gruppo Unipol company has not reported any.

In the current year, Gallagher company and Gruppo Unipol company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gallagher company nor Gruppo Unipol company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Gallagher company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Gruppo Unipol company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gallagher company nor Gruppo Unipol company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gruppo Unipol company nor Gallagher company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Gallagher holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gallagher company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gruppo Unipol company.

Gallagher company employs more people globally than Gruppo Unipol company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Gallagher holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Gallagher holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Gallagher holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Gallagher holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Gallagher holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Gallagher holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References