Comparison Overview

Gruppo Unipol

VS

Bajaj General Insurance

Gruppo Unipol

Via Stalingrado 45 Bologna, Italy 40128, IT
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Unipol Group is one of the leading insurance groups in Europe and the leader in Italy in Non-Life business (particularly in Motor and Health), with total premium income of 15.1 billion euros, including 8.7 billion in Non-Life business and 6.4 billion in Life business (2023 figures). Unipol adopts an integrated offering strategy and covers the full range of insurance products, operating mainly through its subsidiary UnipolSai Assicurazioni. The Group is also active in direct auto insurance (Linear Assicurazioni), transport and aviation insurance (Siat), health protection (UniSalute), supplementary pensions, and oversees the bancassurance channel (Arca Vita and Arca Assicurazioni). It also manages significant diversified activities in the real estate, hotel (UNA Group), health care (Centro Medico Santagostino) and agricultural (Tenute del Cerro) sectors. Unipol Gruppo S.p.A. is listed on the Italian stock exchange.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bajaj General Insurance

Yerawada, Bajaj Insurance House, Pune, Maharastra, IN, 411006
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Bajaj General Insurance Limited (formerly known as Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited) is one of India’s leading, most trusted and dynamic private general insurance companies. It is a subsidiary of Bajaj Finserv Limited, India’s leading and most diversified financial services group. Bajaj General offers a broad portfolio of innovative and customer-focused insurance solutions, spanning motor, health, and home insurance, along with specialised products such as pet insurance, wedding insurance, event protection, cyber insurance, and rural insurance. Established in 2001, the company has grown its footprint to nearly 1,500 towns and cities across India, ensuring easy access and a close connection to its customers. With a strong legacy, a forward-looking mindset, and an unwavering focus on its ‘Customer-First’ philosophy, Bajaj General remains committed to protecting what matters most, empowering individuals, families, and businesses to live with confidence and peace of mind.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 17,108
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unipol-gruppo.jpeg
Gruppo Unipol
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-general-insurance.jpeg
Bajaj General Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gruppo Unipol
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bajaj General Insurance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gruppo Unipol in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bajaj General Insurance in 2026.

Incident History — Gruppo Unipol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gruppo Unipol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bajaj General Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bajaj General Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unipol-gruppo.jpeg
Gruppo Unipol
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bajaj-general-insurance.jpeg
Bajaj General Insurance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gruppo Unipol company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bajaj General Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bajaj General Insurance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gruppo Unipol company.

In the current year, Bajaj General Insurance company and Gruppo Unipol company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bajaj General Insurance company nor Gruppo Unipol company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bajaj General Insurance company nor Gruppo Unipol company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bajaj General Insurance company nor Gruppo Unipol company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gruppo Unipol company nor Bajaj General Insurance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Bajaj General Insurance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gruppo Unipol company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bajaj General Insurance company.

Bajaj General Insurance company employs more people globally than Gruppo Unipol company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Bajaj General Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Bajaj General Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Bajaj General Insurance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Bajaj General Insurance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Bajaj General Insurance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gruppo Unipol nor Bajaj General Insurance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H