Comparison Overview

Union Bank of India

VS

DBS Bank

Union Bank of India

Mumbai, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Union Bank of India is one of the leading public sector banks of the country. The Bank is a listed entity, and the Government of India holds 74.76 percent in Bank’s total paid-up capital. The Bank, having its headquarters at Mumbai (India), was registered on November 11, 1919 as a limited company. On 1st April 2020, Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank were amalgamated into Union Bank of India. Our Bank has a network of 8,400+ domestic branches, 9,300+ ATMs, 74,500+ employees and 19,500+ Business Correspondents . The Bank has expanded its presence across all States and Union Territories. The Bank’s total business as of 30th June 2024 stood at ₹ 21,36,405 crore, comprising ₹ 12,24,191 crore of deposits and ₹ 9,12,214 crore of advances. The Bank also has 2 overseas branches at Dubai International Financial Centre (UAE) & Sydney (Australia); 1 banking subsidiary at London (UK); 1 banking joint venture in Malaysia; 4 para-banking subsidiaries (domestic); 2 joint ventures and 1 associate - Chaitanya Godavari Gramin Bank. Union Bank of India is the first large public sector bank in the country to have implemented 100% core banking solution. The Bank has received several awards and recognition for its prowess in technology, digital banking, financial inclusion, MSME and development of human resources. Do not share your Mobile Number, Account Details, Card details or any other Personal Detail publicly on social media. Avoid clicking unknown links or downloading APKs from emails or messages. Stay alert and cyber-safe

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 19,933
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DBS Bank

12 Marina Boulevard, DBS Asia Central @ Marina Bay Financial Centre Tower 3, Singapore, SG, 018982
Last Update: 2026-01-17

DBS is a leading financial services group in Asia with a presence in 19 markets. Headquartered and listed in Singapore, DBS is in the three key Asian axes of growth: Greater China, Southeast Asia and South Asia. The bank's "AA-" and "Aa1" credit ratings are among the highest in the world. Recognised for its global leadership, DBS has been named “World’s Best Bank” by Global Finance, “World’s Best Bank” by Euromoney and “Global Bank of the Year” by The Banker. The bank is at the forefront of leveraging digital technology to shape the future of banking, having been named “World’s Best Digital Bank” by Euromoney and the world’s “Most Innovative in Digital Banking” by The Banker. In addition, DBS has been accorded the “Safest Bank in Asia“ award by Global Finance for 14 consecutive years from 2009 to 2022. DBS provides a full range of services in consumer, SME and corporate banking. As a bank born and bred in Asia, DBS understands the intricacies of doing business in the region’s most dynamic markets. DBS is committed to building lasting relationships with customers, as it banks the Asian way. Through the DBS Foundation, the bank creates impact beyond banking by supporting social enterprises: businesses with a double bottom-line of profit and social and/or environmental impact. DBS Foundation also gives back to society in various ways, including equipping communities with future-ready skills and building food resilience. With its extensive network of operations in Asia and emphasis on engaging and empowering its staff, DBS presents exciting career opportunities. For more information, please visit www.dbs.com

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 33,276
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unionbankofindia.jpeg
Union Bank of India
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dbs-bank.jpeg
DBS Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Union Bank of India
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DBS Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Union Bank of India in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DBS Bank in 2026.

Incident History — Union Bank of India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Union Bank of India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DBS Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DBS Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unionbankofindia.jpeg
Union Bank of India
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dbs-bank.jpeg
DBS Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing (Credential Harvesting), Mobile Malware, NFC Relay (via NFCGate), Automated Card Addition to Mobile Wallets, Burner Phone Supply Chain, Money Mule Networks
Motivation: Financial Gain, Exploitation of Payment System Weaknesses, Scalable Fraud Operations, Resale of Stolen Goods (Luxury Items)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Union Bank of India company and DBS Bank company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

DBS Bank company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Union Bank of India company has not reported any.

In the current year, DBS Bank company and Union Bank of India company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DBS Bank company nor Union Bank of India company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DBS Bank company nor Union Bank of India company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

DBS Bank company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Union Bank of India company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Union Bank of India company nor DBS Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Union Bank of India nor DBS Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DBS Bank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Union Bank of India company.

DBS Bank company employs more people globally than Union Bank of India company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Union Bank of India nor DBS Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Union Bank of India nor DBS Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Union Bank of India nor DBS Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Union Bank of India nor DBS Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Union Bank of India nor DBS Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Union Bank of India nor DBS Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N