Comparison Overview

Union Printers Home

VS

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens

Union Printers Home

101 S Union Blvd, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80910-3137, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.unionprintershome.com

Union Printers Home has proudly served the Colorado Springs area since 1892. Extremely rich in history and beauty Union Printers Home can truly call itself one of a kind. Look outside its windows and you’ll see our hometown's favorite, often snowcapped mountain, Pikes Peak. Take a stroll on the groomed 27 acre campus and one might just find all the necessities of a perfect place to relax, restore, and heal. Find the serenity and peace you deserve at the Union Printers Home.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens

1 Schenley Park, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.phipps.conservatory.org

Founded in 1893, Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens in Pittsburgh, Pa. is a green leader among public gardens with a mission to inspire and educate all with the beauty and importance of plants; to advance sustainability and promote human and environmental well-being through action and research; and to celebrate its historic glasshouse. Learn more: www.phipps.conservatory.org Connect with us: facebook.com/phippsconservatory instagram.com/phippsconservatory twitter.com/phippsnews youtube.com/user/phippsconservatory snapchat.com/add/phippsnews

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 157
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/union-printers-home.jpeg
Union Printers Home
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phipps-conservatory.jpeg
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Union Printers Home
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Union Printers Home in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens in 2026.

Incident History — Union Printers Home (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Union Printers Home cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/union-printers-home.jpeg
Union Printers Home
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phipps-conservatory.jpeg
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Union Printers Home company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Union Printers Home company.

In the current year, Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company and Union Printers Home company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company nor Union Printers Home company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company nor Union Printers Home company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company nor Union Printers Home company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Union Printers Home company nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Union Printers Home company nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens company employs more people globally than Union Printers Home company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Union Printers Home nor Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References