Comparison Overview

Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

VS

Universität Hohenheim

Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

Saarstr. 21, Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, 55122, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

Die Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (JGU) zählt mit rund 30.000 Studierenden aus 120 Nationen zu den größten und vielfältigsten Universitäten Deutschlands. Mit ihrer Universitätsmedizin, ihren Hochschulen für Kunst und Musik sowie ihrem Fachbereich Translations-, Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft in Germersheim vereint sie nahezu alle akademischen Disziplinen unter einem Dach. In ihren mehr als 100 Instituten und Kliniken lehren und forschen rund 4.400 Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, darunter 560 Professorinnen und Professoren. Mit 75 Fächern und zahlreichen Fachkombinationen bietet die JGU mehr als 260 Studienmöglichkeiten an. Als einzige deutsche Universität ihrer Größe beherbergt die JGU fast alle Institute auf einem innenstadtnahen Campus, auf dem auch vier Partnerinstitute der außeruniversitären Spitzenforschung angesiedelt sind: das Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie (MPI-C), das Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung (MPI-P), das Helmholtz-Institut Mainz (HIM) und das Institut für Molekulare Biologie (IMB). Der Campus der Universitätsmedizin liegt nur etwa einen Kilometer entfernt, die beiden Mainzer Institute der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft – das Institut für Europäische Geschichte (IEG) und das Römisch-Germanische-Zentralmuseum (RGZM) – liegen nur wenig weiter entfernt in der Innenstadt. Hinzu kommen zahlreiche forschende Unternehmen, die Mainz zu einem Forschungsstandort mit hoher Dynamik machen. Die Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, gegründet im Jahr 1477, ist dem Geist ihres Namensgebers auch heute verpflichtet. Innovative Ideen zu fördern und umzusetzen; Wissen zu nutzen, um die Lebensbedingungen der Menschen zu verbessern; sie zu bewegen, die Grenzen zu überschreiten – das ist der Anspruch, dem sich die Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz stellt. https://www.uni-mainz.de/impressum/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3,671
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Universität Hohenheim

Schloß Hohenheim 1, Stuttgart, undefined, Baden-Württemberg, 70599, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 800 and 849

Individuell und einzigartig: so präsentiert sich die Universität Hohenheim als stark spezialisierte und älteste Universität Stuttgarts. Gegründet 1818 nach verheerenden Hungersnöten fühlt sich die Universität Hohenheim neben intensiver Grundlagenforschung immer auch der Tradition verpflichtet, innovative Lösungen für drängende gesellschaftliche Probleme zu entwickeln. Anders als andere Universitäten besitzt die Universität Hohenheim dazu einen bundesweit einmaligen Fächerkanon in den Fakultäten Agrarwissenschaften, Naturwissenschaften und Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. Heute verfügt die Universität über ein einzigartiges Profil, ein gutes, internationales Netzwerk und herausragende Persönlichkeiten. Ihre Geschichte, das Leitbild und eine definierte Strategie geben ihr Orientierung in ihrer weiteren Entwicklung.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,883
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unimainz.jpeg
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universitat-hohenheim.jpeg
Universität Hohenheim
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Universität Hohenheim
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz in 2025.

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universität Hohenheim in 2025.

Incident History — Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Universität Hohenheim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universität Hohenheim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unimainz.jpeg
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universitat-hohenheim.jpeg
Universität Hohenheim
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Universität Hohenheim company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Universität Hohenheim company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz company.

In the current year, Universität Hohenheim company and Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Universität Hohenheim company nor Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Universität Hohenheim company nor Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Universität Hohenheim company nor Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz company nor Universität Hohenheim company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz nor Universität Hohenheim holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz company nor Universität Hohenheim company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz company employs more people globally than Universität Hohenheim company, reflecting its scale as a Hochschulen und Universitäten.

Neither Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz nor Universität Hohenheim holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz nor Universität Hohenheim holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz nor Universität Hohenheim holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz nor Universität Hohenheim holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz nor Universität Hohenheim holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz nor Universität Hohenheim holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L