Comparison Overview

Universität Innsbruck

VS

Kansas State University

Universität Innsbruck

Innrain 52, Innsbruck, tirol, AT, 6020
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 700 and 749

The University of Innsbruck (German: Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck) is one of the major Austrian universities and has been founded in 1669. It is currently the largest research and education institution in Tyrol and third largest in Austria according to student population. Four researchers at the University of Innsbruck were distinguished as nobel laureates.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 3,478
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Kansas State University

119 Anderson Hall, Manhattan, KS, US, 66506
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Kansas State University, often referred to as K-State, is an institution of higher learning located in Manhattan, Kansas, in the United States. A branch campus, including the College of Technology and Aviation, is located in Salina, Kansas. A third campus, K-State Olathe, officially opened on April 26, 2011 and will be the academic research presence within the Kansas Bioscience Park. Kansas State has nearly 24,000 students from all 50 states and more than 100 countries. Social Media User Policy at https://www.k-state.edu/social.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 10,226
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uniinnsbruck.jpeg
Universität Innsbruck
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kansas-state-university.jpeg
Kansas State University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Universität Innsbruck
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kansas State University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universität Innsbruck in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kansas State University in 2025.

Incident History — Universität Innsbruck (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universität Innsbruck cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kansas State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kansas State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uniinnsbruck.jpeg
Universität Innsbruck
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unlawful data request
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kansas-state-university.jpeg
Kansas State University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kansas State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Universität Innsbruck company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Universität Innsbruck company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Kansas State University company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kansas State University company and Universität Innsbruck company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kansas State University company nor Universität Innsbruck company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kansas State University company nor Universität Innsbruck company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kansas State University company nor Universität Innsbruck company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Universität Innsbruck company nor Kansas State University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Universität Innsbruck nor Kansas State University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Universität Innsbruck company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kansas State University company.

Kansas State University company employs more people globally than Universität Innsbruck company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Universität Innsbruck nor Kansas State University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Universität Innsbruck nor Kansas State University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Universität Innsbruck nor Kansas State University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Universität Innsbruck nor Kansas State University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Universität Innsbruck nor Kansas State University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Universität Innsbruck nor Kansas State University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Versions starting with 0.211.0 and prior to 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0 contain a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in their workflow expression evaluation system. Under certain conditions, expressions supplied by authenticated users during workflow configuration may be evaluated in an execution context that is not sufficiently isolated from the underlying runtime. An authenticated attacker could abuse this behavior to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the n8n process. Successful exploitation may lead to full compromise of the affected instance, including unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of workflows, and execution of system-level operations. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to a patched version, which introduces additional safeguards to restrict expression evaluation. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only; and/or deploy n8n in a hardened environment with restricted operating system privileges and network access to reduce the impact of potential exploitation. These workarounds do not fully eliminate the risk and should only be used as short-term measures.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

FastAPI Users allows users to quickly add a registration and authentication system to their FastAPI project. Prior to version 15.0.2, the OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under `state_secret` and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. Any attacker can hit `/authorize`, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading `.../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>`. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for \~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account. Version 15.0.2 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

FileZilla Client 3.63.1 contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability that allows attackers to execute malicious code by placing a crafted TextShaping.dll in the application directory. Attackers can generate a reverse shell payload using msfvenom and replace the missing DLL to achieve remote code execution when the application launches.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LDAP Tool Box Self Service Password 1.5.2 contains a password reset vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate HTTP Host headers during token generation. Attackers can craft malicious password reset requests that generate tokens sent to a controlled server, enabling potential account takeover by intercepting and using stolen reset tokens.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Kimai 1.30.10 contains a SameSite cookie vulnerability that allows attackers to steal user session cookies through malicious exploitation. Attackers can trick victims into executing a crafted PHP script that captures and writes session cookie information to a file, enabling potential session hijacking.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X