Comparison Overview

UniCredit

VS

Bank of America

UniCredit

Piazza Gae Aulenti, 3, Milano, 20154, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

UniCredit is a pan-European Bank with a unique service offering in Italy, Germany, Austria, and Central and Eastern Europe. Our Vision is to be the Bank for Europe's Future. Our Purpose is to Empower Communities to Progress, delivering the best-in-class products and services for all stakeholders, unlocking the potential of our people and our clients across Europe. Our core operations are located in Italy, Germany, Austria and Central and Eastern European Countries, all served by three Group high-quality product factories: Corporate, Individual and Payment Solutions.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 55,599
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Bank of America

100 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC, US, 28202
Last Update: 2025-12-19

Bank of America is one of the world's largest financial institutions, serving individuals, small- and middle-market businesses and large corporations with a full range of banking, investing, asset management and other financial and risk management products and services. The company serves approximately 56 million U.S. consumer and small business relationships. It is among the world's leading wealth management companies and is a global leader in corporate and investment banking and trading. This LinkedIn company page is moderated. For more information, please visit: https://bit.ly/32FDdQr. For account issues, please visit: https://bit.ly/2GeTIeP.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 239,193
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicredit.jpeg
UniCredit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-america.jpeg
Bank of America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UniCredit
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bank of America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UniCredit in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

Bank of America has 4.17% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — UniCredit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UniCredit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bank of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicredit.jpeg
UniCredit
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2020
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-america.jpeg
Bank of America
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error (Email Misconfiguration)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UniCredit company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bank of America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UniCredit and Bank of America have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Bank of America company has reported more cyber incidents than UniCredit company.

Neither Bank of America company nor UniCredit company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Bank of America company and UniCredit company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Bank of America company nor UniCredit company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UniCredit company nor Bank of America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UniCredit nor Bank of America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UniCredit company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bank of America company.

Bank of America company employs more people globally than UniCredit company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither UniCredit nor Bank of America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UniCredit nor Bank of America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UniCredit nor Bank of America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UniCredit nor Bank of America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UniCredit nor Bank of America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UniCredit nor Bank of America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N