Comparison Overview

UniCourt

VS

Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey

UniCourt

P.O. Box 1106, Tustin, CA, 92781-9998, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

UniCourt is a legaltech platform for accessing litigation data, analytics and insights, providing real-time access to over 3,000 state and federal courts across 40+ states. UniCourt’s mission is to capture and organize legal data, making it more accessible and useful by applying cutting-edge AI to extract, structure, and normalize litigation data to fuel the next generation of legal services and solutions. Our flagship product, UniCourt DEEP, surfaces data and insights buried deep in dockets and documents, and enables rapid API integration and data shares connecting to any data warehouse, data lake, or existing application using pre-built integrations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey

1119 Pennsylvania Ave, Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

At Laird & McCloskey, we've represented people for more than 35 years - not big insurance companies or corporate bigwigs. We represent people - like you - and we're intensely proud of that. People come to us because they've been harmed in serious car and trucking accidents, oil and gas industry accidents, construction site accidents, or by defective products. And sometimes they come to us because someone they love – a family member – died in one of those same kinds of accidents. Our job is to be their advocate and be their voice, to stand up in front of a jury on their behalf, and do everything possible to make certain that those who are responsible are held accountable. In court, we have a reputation for being both well-prepared and aggressive, and we're rather proud of that, too. But not all cases go to trial, so if a settlement is appropriate, we bring the same approach, the same attitude, and the same dedication to seeking justice for our clients. It's what we do, and we do it very well. We will make sure that you get the same high-quality legal representation as that big company on the other side.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicourtinc.jpeg
UniCourt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-steven-c-laird-p-c-.jpeg
Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UniCourt
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UniCourt in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey in 2025.

Incident History — UniCourt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UniCourt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicourtinc.jpeg
UniCourt
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-steven-c-laird-p-c-.jpeg
Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both UniCourt company and Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to UniCourt company.

In the current year, Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey company and UniCourt company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey company nor UniCourt company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey company nor UniCourt company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey company nor UniCourt company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UniCourt company nor Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UniCourt nor Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither UniCourt company nor Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

UniCourt company employs more people globally than Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither UniCourt nor Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UniCourt nor Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UniCourt nor Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UniCourt nor Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UniCourt nor Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UniCourt nor Law Offices of Laird & McCloskey holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X