Comparison Overview

Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd

VS

Nutreco

Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd

undefined, Bangalore, Karnataka, undefined, IN
Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Unibic, came to India in 2004 with the iconic Anzac and Bradman cookies. Over the years, Unibic has grown its range to over 30 variants and has been regularly introducing fresh & unique flavours to cookie connoisseurs around the world. Headquartered in Bangalore, Unibic is known for its rich and flavoursome cookies that take a bite of the premium cookie market. Powered by a team of over 800 motivated individuals, Unibic is proud to have top management that comprises industry veterans who bring domain knowledge and the acumen of investors from Peepul Capital. Peepul Capital has been part of the growth journey of more than forty companies across diverse sectors over the last 15 years. Peepul Capital combines the strength of the local investment team with a global reach and focus. The relationships of the team have played a significant role in identifying and sourcing opportunities across various life cycle stages.

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 953
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nutreco

Stationsstraat 77 Amersfoort, Gelderland 3800 AG, NL
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Nutreco is a global leader in animal nutrition and aquafeed. Our advanced nutritional solutions are at the origin of food for millions of consumers worldwide. Quality, innovation and sustainability are guiding principles, embedded in the Nutreco culture from research and raw material procurement to products and services for livestock farming and aquaculture. Experience across 100 years brings Nutreco a rich heritage of knowledge and experience for building its future. Nutreco employs approximately 11,000 people in 35 countries, with sales in over 90 countries.

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition: Food Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unibic-biscuits-india-pvt-ltd.jpeg
Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nutreco.jpeg
Nutreco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nutreco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nutreco in 2025.

Incident History — Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nutreco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nutreco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unibic-biscuits-india-pvt-ltd.jpeg
Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nutreco.jpeg
Nutreco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nutreco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nutreco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd company.

In the current year, Nutreco company and Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nutreco company nor Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nutreco company nor Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nutreco company nor Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd company nor Nutreco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd nor Nutreco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd company nor Nutreco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd company employs more people globally than Nutreco company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Manufacturing.

Neither Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd nor Nutreco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd nor Nutreco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd nor Nutreco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd nor Nutreco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd nor Nutreco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Unibic Foods India Pvt Ltd nor Nutreco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sakai is a Collaboration and Learning Environment. Prior to versions 23.5 and 25.0, EncryptionUtilityServiceImpl initialized an AES256TextEncryptor password (serverSecretKey) using RandomStringUtils with the default java.util.Random. java.util.Random is a non‑cryptographic PRNG and can be predicted from limited state/seed information (e.g., start time window), substantially reducing the effective search space of the generated key. An attacker who can obtain ciphertexts (e.g., exported or at‑rest strings protected by this service) and approximate the PRNG seed can feasibly reconstruct the serverSecretKey and decrypt affected data. SAK-49866 is patched in Sakai 23.5, 25.0, and trunk.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to large memory usage. This requires parsing the content stream of a page using the LZWDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires parsing the content stream of a page which has an inline image using the DCTDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.5, Authlib’s JWE zip=DEF path performs unbounded DEFLATE decompression. A very small ciphertext can expand into tens or hundreds of megabytes on decrypt, allowing an attacker who can supply decryptable tokens to exhaust memory and CPU and cause denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.5. Workarounds for this issue involve rejecting or stripping zip=DEF for inbound JWEs at the application boundary, forking and add a bounded decompression guard via decompressobj().decompress(data, MAX_SIZE)) and returning an error when output exceeds a safe limit, or enforcing strict maximum token sizes and fail fast on oversized inputs; combine with rate limiting.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.4.2, OpenBao's audit log did not appropriately redact fields when relevant subsystems sent []byte response parameters rather than strings. This includes, but is not limited to sys/raw with use of encoding=base64, all data would be emitted unredacted to the audit log, and Transit, when performing a signing operation with a derived Ed25519 key, would emit public keys to the audit log. This issue has been patched in OpenBao 2.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X