Comparison Overview

UNFI

VS

Red Bull

UNFI

313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, RI, US, 02908
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 0 and 549

UNFI is North America’s Premier Food Wholesaler. We transform the world of food for our associates, customers, suppliers and the families we serve every day. With deeper full store selection and compelling brands for every aisle, built on an unmatched heritage in great food and fresh thinking. And smarter food solutions, from fulfillment to insights and beyond, that help entrepreneurs and major brands alike unlock their full potential and transform their businesses – for the better. Better Food. Better Future.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 15,900
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Red Bull

Am Brunnen 1, None, Fuschl, None, AT, 5330
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Red Bull Gives Wiiings to People and Ideas. This has driven us – and all we do – since 1987. Today, Red Bull operates in over 170 countries, selling more than 12 billion cans annually and growing! Above all, our people remain the essential ingredient in bringing the Red Bull brand to life. Check out our open roles to become part of the world of Red Bull. Most jobs take energy, ours give it. Check out our open roles to become part of the world of Red Bull – jobs.redbull.com

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 26,250
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unfi.jpeg
UNFI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-bull.jpeg
Red Bull
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UNFI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red Bull
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

UNFI has 1607.32% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Bull in 2025.

Incident History — UNFI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNFI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Red Bull (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Bull cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unfi.jpeg
UNFI
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Impersonation of Employees, Password Reset Exploitation via IT Help Desk
Motivation: Extortion, Intellectual Property Theft, Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-bull.jpeg
Red Bull
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Red Bull company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UNFI company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UNFI company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Red Bull company has not reported any.

In the current year, UNFI company has reported more cyber incidents than Red Bull company.

UNFI company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Red Bull company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Red Bull company nor UNFI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

UNFI company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Red Bull company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UNFI company nor Red Bull company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UNFI nor Red Bull holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Red Bull company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UNFI company.

Red Bull company employs more people globally than UNFI company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither UNFI nor Red Bull holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UNFI nor Red Bull holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UNFI nor Red Bull holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UNFI nor Red Bull holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UNFI nor Red Bull holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UNFI nor Red Bull holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H