Comparison Overview

Underwood & Riemer, P.C.

VS

Peters & Peters

Underwood & Riemer, P.C.

166 Government Street Suite 100, Mobile, 36602, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our firm focuses on protecting the rights of individuals in Alabama who have suffered mistreatment and abuses from banks, mortgage lenders & servicers, credit card companies and other types of financial entities. We also represent individuals who have been wronged or injured in automobile accidents, by defective products, prescription drugs or defective medical devices.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Peters & Peters

15 Fetter Lane, London, undefined, EC4A 1BW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Peters & Peters is one of the UK's leading law firms in business crime, commercial litigation and compliance. We specialise in commercial disputes, corporate fraud, cartels/antitrust, extradition, corruption, mutual legal assistance and city crime. We also advise companies on compliance and regulation. Our clients include governments, corporates and individuals in the UK and internationally. Our lawyers have been involved in many of the leading cases of recent years and many are recognised as the leading experts in their practice areas. Constantly striving to be innovative, we remain at the cutting edge of legal developments.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 139
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Underwood & Riemer, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peters-&-peters_2.jpeg
Peters & Peters
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Underwood & Riemer, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Peters & Peters
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Underwood & Riemer, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peters & Peters in 2025.

Incident History — Underwood & Riemer, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Underwood & Riemer, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Peters & Peters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peters & Peters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Underwood & Riemer, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peters-&-peters_2.jpeg
Peters & Peters
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Peters & Peters company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Peters & Peters company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company.

In the current year, Peters & Peters company and Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Peters & Peters company nor Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Peters & Peters company nor Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Peters & Peters company nor Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company nor Peters & Peters company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Peters & Peters holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company nor Peters & Peters company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peters & Peters company employs more people globally than Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Peters & Peters holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Peters & Peters holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Peters & Peters holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Peters & Peters holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Peters & Peters holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Peters & Peters holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X