Comparison Overview

Underwood & Riemer, P.C.

VS

Atlee Hall

Underwood & Riemer, P.C.

166 Government Street Suite 100, Mobile, 36602, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our firm focuses on protecting the rights of individuals in Alabama who have suffered mistreatment and abuses from banks, mortgage lenders & servicers, credit card companies and other types of financial entities. We also represent individuals who have been wronged or injured in automobile accidents, by defective products, prescription drugs or defective medical devices.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Atlee Hall

415 North Duke St, Lancaster, PA, 17602, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Atlee Hall is a law firm serving Lancaster County and the surrounding areas. Our reputation is for providing fearless, confident representation in complex cases that many other firms will not take. Each case we take on is unique, whether it’s medical malpractice, personal injury, products liability, vehicle accidents, liquor liability, or a wrongful death case. The team at Atlee Hall – from the attorneys to the legal support staff - will give your case the thorough and careful attention it deserves. Our team is unafraid to take on large corporations or organizations in our quest to attain justice. We fight hard for our clients and apply our three-pronged approach to building our cases: 1) Investigate, 2) Analyze, 3) Synthesize. This thorough and detailed approach has proven to be a winning formula. Our firm and lawyers hold memberships and affiliations with several national legal associations and local organizations, including the Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Lancaster Bar Association, PA Association for Justice, and the American Association of Justice. Our Lancaster office is located on North Duke Street near the E. Lemon Street intersection. On-street parking is available, or you may park in our private lot behind the building. To schedule a free initial consultation to discuss your case, call us at (717) 393-9596 or visit our website.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Underwood & Riemer, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlee-hall-llp.jpeg
Atlee Hall
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Underwood & Riemer, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlee Hall
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Underwood & Riemer, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlee Hall in 2025.

Incident History — Underwood & Riemer, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Underwood & Riemer, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlee Hall (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlee Hall cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Underwood & Riemer, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlee-hall-llp.jpeg
Atlee Hall
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlee Hall company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Atlee Hall company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company.

In the current year, Atlee Hall company and Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlee Hall company nor Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlee Hall company nor Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlee Hall company nor Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company nor Atlee Hall company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Atlee Hall holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Atlee Hall company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company.

Atlee Hall company employs more people globally than Underwood & Riemer, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Atlee Hall holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Atlee Hall holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Atlee Hall holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Atlee Hall holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Atlee Hall holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Underwood & Riemer, P.C. nor Atlee Hall holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X