Comparison Overview

Under One Roof Psychological Services

VS

Catalpa Health

Under One Roof Psychological Services

4915 NE 25th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Under One Roof Psychological Services Our Mission Statement is to improve lives and outcomes through empowering children, families and educators. Goals and Objectives Members of the Under One Roof team will engage best practices in providing care, using evidence-based approaches and treatments. This includes consulting with other highly-trained clinicians, coordinating care and collaborating with multidisciplinary teams, tailoring treatment to individual families’ needs, and monitoring progress of treatment goals. Care providers will continue to increase their knowledge and skill though continuing education and following the latest research to help improve clients outcomes. Product Services offered will include cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, and parent coaching, as well as assessment and evaluation for giftedness, learning disabilities and developmental disorders such as ADHD and Autism. Team members will also provide school-based consultation services to support children in their educational setting, as well as medication prescriptions and management.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Catalpa Health

4635 W College Ave, Appleton, Wisconsin, 54914, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Catalpa Health is a pediatric mental health and wellness organization that serves kids, teens and their families across Northeastern Wisconsin. Founded as a collaboration by Ascension Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin and Thedacare in 2012 to reduce barriers, eliminate stigma, provide a full continuum of care and emerge as a center of excellence dedicated to providing outpatient pediatric mental health services for children and teens, ages birth – 18. Services offered include individual and family counseling; group therapy; medication management, psychological and neuropsychological testing; and concussion testing. We know kids and teens. We see their worries, their wishes, the pressures they're under. We know how important and child's mental health and wellness is to living everyday life, and to relationships within the family.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/under-one-roof-psychological-services.jpeg
Under One Roof Psychological Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalpa-health.jpeg
Catalpa Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Under One Roof Psychological Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Catalpa Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Under One Roof Psychological Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Catalpa Health in 2026.

Incident History — Under One Roof Psychological Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Under One Roof Psychological Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Catalpa Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Catalpa Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/under-one-roof-psychological-services.jpeg
Under One Roof Psychological Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalpa-health.jpeg
Catalpa Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Under One Roof Psychological Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Catalpa Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Catalpa Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Under One Roof Psychological Services company.

In the current year, Catalpa Health company and Under One Roof Psychological Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Catalpa Health company nor Under One Roof Psychological Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Catalpa Health company nor Under One Roof Psychological Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Catalpa Health company nor Under One Roof Psychological Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Under One Roof Psychological Services company nor Catalpa Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Under One Roof Psychological Services nor Catalpa Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Under One Roof Psychological Services company nor Catalpa Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Catalpa Health company employs more people globally than Under One Roof Psychological Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Under One Roof Psychological Services nor Catalpa Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Under One Roof Psychological Services nor Catalpa Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Under One Roof Psychological Services nor Catalpa Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Under One Roof Psychological Services nor Catalpa Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Under One Roof Psychological Services nor Catalpa Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Under One Roof Psychological Services nor Catalpa Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N