Comparison Overview

UNC Health

VS

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

UNC Health

101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, 27516, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of North Carolinians and others whom we serve. We accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education and research. UNC Health and its 33,000 employees, continue to serve as North Carolina’s Health Care System, caring for patients from all 100 counties and beyond our borders. We continue to leverage the world class research conducted in the UNC School of Medicine, translating that innovation to life-saving and life-changing therapies, procedures, and techniques for the patients who rely on us. General terms of service for UNC Health social media: https://www.facebook.com/unchealthcare/about_details

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,216
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Av. Paulista 867, São Paulo, SP, BR, 01311-100
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Com cerca de 80 anos de experiência, a Hapvida é hoje a maior empresa de saúde integrada da América Latina. A companhia, que possui mais de 69 mil colaboradores, atende quase 16 milhões de beneficiários de saúde e odontologia espalhados pelas cinco regiões do Brasil. Todo o aparato foi construído a partir de uma visão voltada ao cuidado de ponta a ponta, a partir 87 hospitais, 77 prontos atendimentos, 341 clínicas médicas e 291 centros de diagnóstico por imagem e coleta laboratorial, além de unidades especificamente voltadas ao cuidado preventivo e crônico. Dessa combinação de negócios, apoiada em qualidade médica e inovação, resulta uma empresa com os melhores recursos humanos e tecnológicos para os seus clientes.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 35,130
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unchealth.jpeg
UNC Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapvidasaude.jpeg
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UNC Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNC Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica in 2025.

Incident History — UNC Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNC Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unchealth.jpeg
UNC Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapvidasaude.jpeg
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UNC Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UNC Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company and UNC Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company nor UNC Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UNC Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company nor UNC Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UNC Health company nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UNC Health nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UNC Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company.

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company employs more people globally than UNC Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither UNC Health nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UNC Health nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UNC Health nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UNC Health nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UNC Health nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UNC Health nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N